I loved Street Legal! ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Willkie" <johnwillkie@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 7:24 PM Subject: [opendtv] Re: Channel approval process > And, because I DO UNDERSTAND this -- I've followed the topic for more than 3 > decades and counting -- does make it right. Have you been following the > topic since 1972? (Anybody who follows the topic knows that was the hot year > for the topic, when cable issues were 'non-decided.') > > Why would you think that local into local even addresses any constitutional > issue? Me, I see contracts, affiliation contracts, that are actually > honored (honoured) by local into local. The First Amendment says in > pertinent part that Congress shall not make any law abridging freedom of the > press. (Copyrights are covered in the Constitution itself.) > > That doesn't mean that ALL information is free, or that the First Amendment > trumps all contracts, or that parties between themselves cannot decide to > establish exclusive rights and defined territories for those rights. Nor > does the first amendment mean that one state can decide to make driver's > license information private, while others consider it to be public > information. > > Nor, does it mean that the FCC cannot decide that certain contracts are > anti-competitive, or limit the ability of the FCC to redefine market > boundaries, or decide that whatever the contract says, the "exclusive area" > of an affiliation agreement does not extend to the market boundaries but is > limited to a 35 mile radius circle from the transmitter location. > > There are situations where there are two or more stations affiliated to the > same network within the same market. The market that contains York, PA used > to have 4 CBS affiliates, 4 ABC affiliates and 3 NBC affiliates. Mostly, > this was because of market consolidation by the FCC. > > These subjects are complex for the uninitiated to understand. I started my > initiation in September of 1972. > > There is an upshot from this that I benefit from. There are no North > American agreements that limit the ability of a cable system in one country > to carry the local TV stations of another country. And, there are > international agreements that serve to prevent one country from jamming the > stations of another country. > > I COULD go on about this forever. Since you're on defense and ONLY have the > Canadian perspective -- mostly gleaned from folklore and from press sources > (at whose behest this situation was created (See: McLean's/CBC/etc.) I > suspect that you would run out of live ammunition first. > > Also, I admire some Canadian content, unlike many Americans. When I was > running my LPTV station, we were the only station in the U.S. to carry > "Street Legal", the Canadian equivalent of "L.A. Law." The first few > seasons (when it was an early evening CBC show were almost dreadful, but > once it went prime Time, in some cases LA Law copied Street Legal plot > lines. I even had a CBC sales rep. Heck, I still have a "Street Legal" > crew jacket. (The male lead in the CBS show "JAG" first came to "fame" as > the male love interest of one of the characters on Street Legal. Funny > seeing him in a US Navy officer's uniform.) In the same era, I also thought > "Material World" was a fairly good show. > > Under the first amendment, individual and parties can decide to limit the > extent of their speech. Nothing new there. However, the government is not > so empowered. > > How was local into local a limiting of anything? It created a service where > none existed before. While respecting, for the most part, contractual > rights. > > John Willkie > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.