Dale Kelly wrote: > It occurs to me that this maybe to position Cable companies > to take a tougher stance in retransmission consent > negotiations. Any thoughts? My thought: it is SO COOL to see market forces really at work. It makes as much sense for cable companies to encourage OTA reception as it does for DBS companies to do so. This makes life easier for *them*, and at the same time their appeal to consumers is not reduced at all. If anything, the stabilizing effect this should have on subscription fees should be a good thing for consumers. What is the "equal and opposite reaction" to this? Ironically, my take would be that broadcasters will reduce their demands for compensation, to prevent cable companies from making liberal use of this technique. Broadcasters will lose some of the subscription fee revenues they get for HDTV over cable. The next question is what effect this will have to encouraged or discourage OTA broadcasters from optimizing their OTA plants. That could be argued both ways. I suppose if cable companies are very successful at this, OTA broadcasters would then be encouraged to optimize their facilities. Conversely, if cable customers object strongly, or if cable companies are totally inept at making this work, broadcasters might prefer to keep their OTA plants less than ideal. What strange webs we weave. This is directed only at digital OTA streams as of now. I guess that means they don't have any legal issues to worry about, until after analog shutoff. After analog shutoff, cable companies can probably get away with transmitting only an SD version of the "main channel" of the OTA broadcasts anyway, to meet their requirement. Not sure about this. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.