Craig Birkmaier wrote: > Apple was in a strong position to get a short term exclusive, before > HBO signs up other middlemen that are NOT MVPDs. As expected, Craig's fascination with Apple makes him miss the entire story. Apple is hardly the story, Craig. > The important story here is that by doing the deal with Apple, HBO > put pressure on its MVPD partners to agree to a better revenue split > ...for HBO. Chuckles. The important point is only that HBO is going it alone, not relying on any single hardware vendor, such as Apple, to create obstacles. And also, that as of now, until net neutrality becomes law, HBO has to twist the arms of the ISP middlemen, with conflicting interests of their own, who try to prevent HBO from pursuing its own best interests as it sees fit. > Cablevision had the good sense to see this and move proactively to > protect its customer base. HBO wins either way. Of course HBO wins, because HBO is the owner of the valuable resource. The other players may also win, in playing their part, but only if they behave in ways that the consumer accepts. For example, an Apple exclusive? Give me a break. Why would HBO ever agree to that? What would Apple offer that would increase HBO revenues, compared with making its content available online to ANY device? Cablevision had the good sense to understand this consumer migration to online Internet reception of all manner of TV material. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.