On Oct 17, 2014, at 8:36 PM, Manfredi, Albert E <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'll buy that this shows what "a la carte" could end up costing, but this is > proof positive that the bundle is being unbundled. Something you keep saying > will never happen. CBS is part of your "the bundle," and CBS is saying, I > will go this one alone, in addition to staying with the bundle, for the > hangers on. 1. CBS is not part of "the bundle." It is required as part of the basic service for earthbound MVPDs (optional for DBS subscribers). 2. It is available FOTA throughout the U.S 3. As YOU pointed out, many of the programs the new service will offer are already available via CBS.com and Hulu (free), and Hulu Plus (subscription). 4. The obvious target audience for the service is people who do not subscribe to a MVPD service. > >> Not really. The markets where live streams are available are the >> markets where CBS owns the stations. Moonves has not extended the >> right to stream CBS programming to affiliates. > > That's the plan. Check back again, Craig. Yes, affiliated stations, a growing > number of them. Here are the actual words: > > "Subscribers will be able to stream local CBS television stations in 14 > markets, including Chicago, Los Angeles and New York, with more affiliates > expected to join. (People have long been able to watch broadcast television > networks free via antennas.)" > Earth to Bert. These are all of the markets where CBS owns stations. >> Why do you think CBS is losing viewers because of cord cutting Bert? > > Not so much viewers, but revenue. They are losing that second revenue stream > because Disney and others are driving up the cost of cable. People then cut > the cord. So, as I've said many times before, why can't these congloms sell > direct, without having to make themselves vulnerable to the demands of > competing congloms? And, that's what leads to the unravelling of the bundle. > Uhhhh. CBS is part of the content oligopoly that CONTROLS the extended basic bundle. To be fair, CBS did not build up cable network assets through the use of retransmission consent, as did the other major broadcast networks, and their brief liaison with Viacom - which was intended to beef up this part of the portfolio - left CBS in a lesser position compared to the other members of the oligopoly. Obviously all of the members of the content oligopoly can and do sell content direct, and to third parties. But this new service does NOTHING to threaten the bundle business model. The only REAL benefit of this $6/mo subscription is on demand access to the CBS program library. Access to live streams in CBS O&O markets is nice for mobile devices, but the content most people would use this for - NFL Football - is not part of the package. > And OTA does not offer as much as this site would. Here, you would get an > entire season of shows, as well as classic shows, and who knows what else. > Some of which is also available at cbs.com, except of course all those > limited-capability TV boxes can't get cbs.com. You just pointed out the real Achilles heal of the CBS strategy. They are throwing stuff at the wall to see what sticks. But none of these efforts threaten the core business model - get people to subscribe to an MVPD service so they can generate that second revenue stream. And as I said above, this is primarily a VOD play. Viewing shows from the classic TV library is ad free. The promotional materials focus attention on binge viewing. There is no long term commitment; you can cancel at any time. It may well be that CBS hopes to get people to subscribe for a month or two when they want to binge view an old series. It is important to note that CBS All Access does not offer some of the exclusive content available via FOTA antenna or a MVPD service. In essence they are complementary. >> Do you REALLY think that the cord cutters will pay $5.99/mo for >> CBS content? > > Maybe, because most cord cutters have been brainwashed by the press, and even > by the CE manufacturers, that to get TV without the cord, they need to > subscribe to Hulu Plus, Netflix, or other pay sites. CBS has some of the best > content out there. So they may well get some takers. > > But the main take-away is, CBS is breaking the bundle, Craig. > Wrong. Regards Craig ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.