John Shutt wrote: > Not every market has a Mt. Wilson. Case in point is our own market. > Sticks are all over the compass, separated by 25-30 miles in some > cases. So viewers can't park a single antenna in one location to > get everyone. Power levels are all over the place as well, causing > lower power stations (us) to get front end loaded right out of > viewers' homes who happen to live closer to a 3rd adjacent running > 9 dB more power than we are allocated . Well, I can certainly agree that co-located transmit antennas of similar power outpout are a good idea. But you don't need a "spectrum utility" model, or many small sticks, to achieve that goal. NYC seems to manage to co-locate a whole slew of transmit antennas on the Empire State Building. As does Mt Wilson (LA) and Sutro Tower (SF). How do they manage that without a spectrum utility? I honestly don't understand why different US markets are so radically different in this regard. Over here, for instance, we have four TV stations sharing a single tower. But this was not always the case. For some inexplicable (to me) reason, a tower once shared by Ch 7 and Ch 9 is now also shared by Ch 26 and Ch 66. Why did this take so long? I don't know. The DTV transition seems to have helped in this regard. We still have transmitters scattered way over to the West. Anyway, doing this with a main transmitter site and potentially also with smaller sites, either as SFN or MFN gap fillers, seems to me to be something that the broadcasters themselves would want. I do not think you need to create a separate spectrum ultility entity, or certainly a bunch of small sticks in an unlikely SFN, to achieve this goal. IMO. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.