[opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies
- From: Tom Barry <trbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 01:08:19 -0400
Manfredi, Albert E wrote:
> Dan Grimes wrote:
>
>
>> There are strong difference between cable, DBS and OTA that
>> affect how much the FCC can control. I had always thought
>> that the airwaves were considered to be publicly owned and
>> the FCC regulated them in the public interest. That is very
>> different than a closed system such as a cable or fiber
>> system that is privately owned and/or franchised. I always
>> thought DBS is more like OTA broadcast from a physical
>> standpoint but seems to enjoy the attributes of cable.
>>
>
> I do agree with this, Dan. DBS and OTA are more comparable. And also, DBS
> enjoys the same perks as cabled systems, not OTA systems.
>
> But the FCC can't hide its head in the sand either. The reality of today is
> that the vast majority of people use these MVPDs for news and entertainment,
> rather than OTA broadcast networks. Therefore, given this fact of life, it is
> uncalled for to put what amounts to destructive limitations ONLY on the FOTA
> broadcasters. And to use what amounts to irrelevant rhetoric to support their
> position.
>
> Realities matter too. The FCC is grabbing spectrum from broadcasters using
> "reality of today" as the excuse. Therefore, we must conclude that the FCC
> understands the concept of reality of the marketplace. Rules for OTA pipes
> must be modernized.
>
> But okay, if need be, let's see them putting 39 percent national caps on DBS.
> We'll start there.
>
> Bert
>
It might be silly to have 39% caps when there are only 2 players in the
space. But it might be even sillier to continue to have anti-monopoly
caps on a media distribution channel relied upon by < 10% of households
and shrinking. It is hard to imagine anybody will care 20 years from now.
- Tom
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Tom Barry
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Tom Barry
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- dan . grimes
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- dan . grimes
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- John Shutt
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Tom Barry
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- dan . grimes
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Tom Barry
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- dan . grimes
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Mark A. Aitken
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- dan . grimes
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies - Tom Barry
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Albert Manfredi
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Albert Manfredi
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Broadcasters Lobby FCC for Cross-Ownership and Duopolies- Craig Birkmaier