Craig Birkmaier wrote: > But localism lies at the very heart of the political/corporate > partnership that is broadcast TV. It gives the false sense that > there are hundreds of independent voices focused on the local > markets that the Congress critters serve. And it provides hundreds > of local newscasts between elections for the politicians to get > some local face time. Okay, so here's the sort of design that could achieve spectrum savings and still provide even more "localism" than people can stomach. You assign one 6 MHz channel for any number of "local" broadcasts. You can cram at least 5, and even up to 10 local shows in that one 6 MHz channel. The rest of the channels are used by regional or national networks. *Now* we can make the case that perhaps "cellular TV" would be part of the solution. Would have been nice to see a more complete discussion of this topic at the FCC meeting on June 25. Because what we are left with is a return of OTA TV to what it was at the beginning of TV, I'm afraid, as far as choice goes, anyway. As far as I can tell, the FCC people went away from that meeting without a clue as to why the much ballyhooed "cellular TV" idea was said to be such a bust by these experts. They're probably still puzzling about it now. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.