Aside from my own personal feeling of mild nausea with much 3D content, I always saw 3D TV as an answer to a question no was asked. There was no significant consumer interest or push behind 3D TV. It was instead mostly a steady, I'd say even insistent, trickle of CE company news briefs. From my point of view, aside from glasses, smaller sweet spots for viewing, nausea, and the rest, is that none of the 3D TV standards out there was even slightly elegant. The one that might have been elegant, the 2D plus delta scheme, was not yet worked out and therefore, as far as I could tell, was never even mentioned by the multiple TV standards bodies. Sorry, but having to transmit twice the image content is just plain brute force ugly. Side by side or over and under, who cares? Hopefully, 4K won't suffer from any of these problems. For one, no problem upconverting HD or even SD content to 4K, in the TV monitor itself. You won't get a sharper image, most likely (unless you have some real fancy image processing guesswork there), but you will get a TV that looks like it has a liquid screen. And for another, we now have either H.265 or VP9 that potentially could be introduced at the same time. As a single jump from H.262 to H.265/VP9, for OTA or cable, that might just solve the bandwidth question. And it would be an elegant solution. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.