I' m not interested in, or going to join in with, a point-scoring battle. That alone is the reason why I only lurk here and rarely comment. If you want to play games like that, you'll have to do it with someone else. But I'll deal with this singe relevant point. 4: The spare bandwidth isn't available at times that people watch tv, it's overnight. That's the whole point, some channels on Freeview are not operative for 24 hours, so there's spare bandwidth during each 24-hour period. What's the point of transmitting a good HD production at 4 a.m.? ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Willkie" <JohnWillkie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 1:04 AM Subject: [opendtv] Re: BBC Demonstrates HDTV Broadcasts over SD Channels > interlineations in-line > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alan Roberts" <roberts.mugswell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 12:03 PM > Subject: [opendtv] Re: BBC Demonstrates HDTV Broadcasts over SD Channels > > 4: The BBC demo isn't a kludge, it's a simple means of using spare > > bandwidth, there can't be anything wrong with that. It was developed > because > > it's a good idea. Even when we've got full HD broadcasting, it could still > > be a useful way to get non-SD signals out over the existing SD network at > no > > cost. > > > > Here's an idea: use the spare bandwidth for real-time HDTV. I agree that > there is nothing wrong with kludges if that's all that you can do. I > thought there were all sorts of interactive services that were going to clog > up the available bandwidth. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.