[opendtv] Re: Analysis: Should Apple Buy Hollywood?

  • From: "Mike Tsinberg" <Mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 09:28:13 -0500

Some of the reasons could be compression efficiency for progressive is
better then interlace and interlace to progressive conversion is relatively
low cost and reasonable quality now. This paper analyzes this issue for
MPEG2 that was optimized for interlace:

 http://www.stephanepigeon.com/Docs/pg.pdf


Mike Tsinberg
http://keydigital.com



-----Original Message-----
From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Manfredi, Albert E
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 4:11 PM
To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [opendtv] Re: Analysis: Should Apple Buy Hollywood?

Ron Economos wrote:

> Some of us graybeards are a little concerned (given that there is 60+ 
> years of interlaced content floating around).

In religion, politics, and engineering, the zealots are always a problem.

In my work, supporting legacy is an absolute mandate. You'd be considered
quite incompetent at your job if you didn't get that in your head.

Bert

 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org 

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.


 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
FreeLists.org 

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. opendtv
  3. Archive
  4. 03-2012