Craig Birkmaier posted: http://www.multichannel.com/news/distribution/aereo-were-cable-system-subject-statutory-license/375819 This part is pretty hilarious: "That is the most important next step, given the Court's ruling that Aereo has been violating plaintiff's exclusive rights to publicly perform their works for over two years, during which time plaintiffs, as this court held, have suffered irreparable harm." So now, Aereo violated the broadcaster's rights to tranmit their signals? And the broadcasters suffered irreparable harm? Does that mean that the broadcasters are forver out of business or something, thanks to Aereo? The term "drama queen" comes to mind. Aereo's tactic to now seek this statutory license seems fair enough, given that some of the Supremes couldn't figure out how Aereo was different from MVPDs, but with it will come the broadcasters' option of asking for "must carry" or for "retransmission consent." So this new angle will not make Aereo immune to broadcasters' demands by any means. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.