[opendtv] Re: 7" ATSC TV

  • From: Frank Eory <frank.eory@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:42:12 -0700

Dale Kelly wrote:

Please see the recent FCC test results of eight current model "5th Gen" type
receivers. None met the minimal A/74 recommendations: two were close while
the others were poor. However, none performed nearly well enough for the
packed spectrum environments existing in most metropolitan areas. They are
be particularly vulnerable to interference from the new unlicensed services
which will operate in "white spaces" between existing DTV channels.

Given that this performance short coming is related to poor RF front end
design I know that you won't be surprised at the findings since you have
recognized and discussed this potential problem in the past.
It seems to me that to undo all of the excellent and costly work done to
improve VSB processors by using a cheap front end, is unconscionable. There
are a number of off-the-shelf tuner designs which would prevent such
problems if used and the additional cost would be small when manufactured in
mass.


I agree that not meeting the minimal A/74 recommendations is pretty lame, but I don't know how you can say with certainty that these performance issues are entirely related to "poor RF front end design." A top-notch tuner coupled to a mediocre baseband chip or a mediocre tuner coupled to a top-notch baseband chip could both exhibit similar performance shortcomings in end-to-end tests. Even issues that appear to be primarily RF front-end-related (like adjacent channel rejection) may be significantly affected by baseband chip parameters like ADC performance and resolution, front-end digital filtering (or lack thereof) and other elements of the baseband chip design.

In any case, the market will continue to decide how much incremental receiver performance is worth. My guess is that CE products will continue to include the very best RF front end + baseband chips, as long as those also happen to be the cheapest ones -- because the perceived value of an ATSC receiver to most consumers is pretty close to $0.

If a "decent" tuner can be had for around $2 and a "decent" ATSC baseband chip can be had for around $5 (hypothetical prices, but probably not too far out), why would any TV manufacturer pay more than that for higher performance components? Can he charge more for the TV set if he does? Highly unlikely.

-- Frank


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts: