On Apr 15, 2013, at 5:50 PM, "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The case for 4K is actually reasonable. It brings the image resolution in > line with what a good but still affordable lens can deliver, on a large > format (say 18mm X 24mm, like 35mm movies) image sensor. This would be a > digital format that does what film was able to do for a very long time. > Extract all the quality you can out of the lens. > > 4K mean 3840 X 2160 pixels, or 8.3 Mpel image. A good 35 mm lens averages > about 70 lp/mm of resolution, across the frame. So in a movie format, that's > the equivalent of about 8.5 Mpels. The case for oversampling during production is compelling; this provides the highest quality possible for venues that need the resolution like theaters, and when resampled for other forms of distribution helps to reduce entropy, and thus make compression more efficient. Perhaps Bert needs to be reminded of a key concept that makes the new digital media very different from the analog media it has (mostly) replaced. That concept is DECOUPLING. In essence, we now live in a world where Acquisition, Production and MANY forms of Emission are decoupled. Regards Craig ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.