> - Speaking today at the Senate Commerce Committee hearing > on indecency, FCC head Kevin Martin said the commission > was wrong in finding previously that "a la carte" cable > (where consumers pay only for channels they want) would > cost the public more than the current system of tiers: <http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262484A1.pdf> Except that the main motivation for this was to give parents more choice as to what their kids watch on TV, not to reduce the price of cable for the average customer. The main thrust of Martin's talk was "decency." And even then, he discounted the additional cost of whatever extra hardware would be needed for a la carte programming. And as far as I can tell, other administrative costs weren't mentioned. And on top of that, he isn't really addressing a la carte, but rather a more varied quantity of tiers. He calls it "more a la carte," and talks about subscribing for bundles, not individual programs. Unless cable companies are making excessively high profits now, one has to figure that the median cable subscriber would pay somewhat more, not less, with "more a la carte" programming. The cost of running the plant won't go down, so what I think would happen is that the basic tier subscribers would be subsidized more than they are now, the median would be paying roughly the same (with a marginal increase caused by the additional overhead incurred by the service provider), and the top tiers would go up in price compared to now. If this were truly a la carte, then the situation would be even more onerous, and a lot of those channels that are carried now to appease legislators would go dark, since they take up space and provide no significant revenue. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.