John Shutt wrote: > You have some nerve writing this. Dingell and other > didn't push for COFDM because it was people like YOU > screaming back in 1999 that the fix to ATSC was easy, > and was mere months away. I will reconstruct for you what I have thought over the years. Back in 1999, I saw basically another religious war on modulation, not unlike the IP vs OSI, Token Ring vs Ethernet, and ATM vs FDDI and Ethernet, that I had been through during the 1990s. Mostly overly dogmatic, ignoramus rantings from both sides. Insults taking place of intelligent and constructive dialogue. The Brazil tests of 1999 were not good for 8-VSB. At *that* time, I was not opposed to a change of physical layer. When the Hong Kong test results of 2000 came in, I figured that maybe this was not quite as simple as some thought. The dogmatic rantings got even worse. Instead of discussing intelligently why the Hong Kong results were so good, the clueless preferred to pretend the results were terrible for 8-VSB. Truly dishonest. Hopefully the dishonesty was not deliberate, merely resulting from lack of understanding. But basically, the CRC report of 2002 should have put an end to the silliness. The decision to stay the course had been made by then and there was some real promise in those results. Instead, John, the COFDM crowd preferred to ignore and distort, rather than suck it up and make this work. Yes, I did and still do see that there are certain advantages to suppressed carrier schemes. That's why I was always intrigued by the developments. Then again, I happen to be an engineer with no stake in this matter. To me, it's an interesting academic exercise. There's no reason for me to lie or distort the truth. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.