Frank Eory wrote: > Case in point, the DTV tuner mandate. Except that > manufacturer A isn't being too greedy -- it is the U.S. > government that is trying to "force the public to buy > something they really had not intended to buy." You mean, sort of like seat belts, catalytic converters, 5 mph bumpers, air bags, third brake light, etc. etc. The public would very likely opt out of most of those extra cost bennies too, especially when they were first introduced. They have since come to appreciate them, of course. > The only sets that will be replaced by integrated > sets are in the homes of the relatively few consumers > who insist on having DTT reception capability. Everyone > else will refuse to "buy something they really had not > intended to buy." First, let me point out that you changed the subject. We were talking about providing transitional STBs for ATSC, vs only integrated sets, at first. However, to continue on this new subject: "Relatively few," meaning some 22 million households, or about 44 million sets at the very least. These owners will be looking for STBs at first, then integrated sets. But you forget the most clever aspect of this: the digital cable tuner. It will be another ~90 million households that will consider the possibility of ditching their enforced cable company STB. No one is prohibiting the manufacture of monitors. It is entirely possible that some manufacturers will decide to sell only monitors and separate STBs. Then people will look at the delta price and discover, lo and behold, manufacturer A's monitor sells for the same as manufacturer B's integrated set, which includes *digital cable* and DTT receiver. For more expensive sets, this will certainly happen. Who the heck cares whether the new Plasma or LCD TV costs (say) $800 or $835? Or $2000 vs $2035? And the more expensive ones include cable tuner too? Remember the original Sony Profeel monitor? It was on the market only about one year. For the small and cheap portable, the question will be whether you want the set at all. I doubt anyone would be looking too hard for portable monitors to lug around to the ball game, with separate STB. So the additional $35 (on 1/1/2007) will be well worth the price, if you really want that portable set. > Except for the fact that consumers don't really "buy" > STBs -- they either rent them (the cable MSO model) or > pay a nominal fee for a heavily subsidized unit (the > DBS model). Ask John Shutt whether PBS will "rent" or "subsidize" ATSC STBs for 22 million OTA households + portables. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.