[openbeosstorage] Re: Progress Update
- From: "Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 17:35:10 CET (+0100)
> > Don't hold your breath though. Things tend to go a little slower
> > than
> > expected. :-(
>
> No worries. I, too, shall continue to take far longer to complete
> tasks
> than I will claim necessary. ;-)
:-)
> > BTW, have you tried the R5 Pro CD with your session module?
>
> Nope, I hadn't. I'm glad someone finally did, though, see below.
>
> > It's the
> > only multi-session CD I have at hand and unfortunately only its
> > first
> > session is reported. The first time I tested was after some
> > changes,
> > but none to the session module and none that could possibly have
> > such
> > a
> > side effect (I hope at least ;-).
>
> Nope, definitely not your fault. :-)
That's quite a relief. ;-)
> > Here's, what the test program
> > prints,
> > when debug output is enabled for disk_scanner (I added some more
> > output
> > to track the problem down) and the session module (and a fs/testfs
> > module that does nothing). Of interest are perhaps only the last 10
> > -15
> > lines, but for sake of completeness... ;-)
> <SNIP>
>
> It turns out that the R5 Pro CD has one "session", containing three
> "tracks", those terms being the ones used by the specs. That's the
> first CD I've seen with more than one "track" per "session". I'd
> wondered if it might be possible, but hadn't stumbled across or been
> able to create such a CD thus far. Thus, I'm glad to have such an
> example now, though it's going to make things a little more
> complicated.
Fascinating. Obviously I know only very little about CD formats.
> So, I'm now in the process of updating the cdrom session module, and
> will tackle Joliet volume names when I finish.
Fine, so you're at least not out of work. :-)
CU, Ingo
Other related posts:
