Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Wow, I really had a lot of unanswered mail. Sorry for taking so > > long on > > most of these; I spent a great deal of time in bed with the flu > > last > > week. :-( > Hope, you're better now. Me too! > > Pending Ingo's approval, what do you guys think about including > > Reiser > > support in the main cvs, too=3F > No problem in principle, except maybe, that it is GPLed. I'm not sure > what > the official politics regarding code governed by the GPL is, though. > If it > is a separate component, like a FS add-on (or any add-on), it > shouldn't > do any harm. I think so, too. We *will* have many GPL'd applications anyway, and I think the ReiserFS would be a nice addition. > > IMHO, it'd be good for us to include > > out-of-the-box support for as many of the following as we can: bfs, > > iso9660, fat, ext2/3, reiser, udf, ntfs, cdda. > No need to make haste, I suppose, since they'll need to be ported to > the > new API anyway. So, we may as well wait until we have some time to do > that. Exactly - for now, the two file systems in our repository are for R5, and I still haven't completed the OpenBeOS FS API yet. Adios... Axel.