[openbeosstorage] Re: Getting rid of kernel_interface.POSIX.cpp
- From: Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:18:30 +0200
On 2004-06-29 at 22:10:01 [+0200], Axel Dörfler wrote:
> Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > We're not really in any terrible hurry to get the tests working again
> > anyway. It would be nice to have them, but I don't think it's
> > critical for
> > the time being. We'll have enough support for them to build and run
> > under
> > Haiku eventually, and we can deal with any issues they uncover at
> > that time.
> > So I'd say a) is fine with me too.
>
> I think so, too. As a first step, I will let LibBeAdapter.cpp export
> the Haiku Node Monitor syscalls, and call the R5 ones from there - that
> way, we can still build the Storage Kit for R5 and Haiku for now.
> Later, when we extend the kernel API and remove
> kernel_interface.POSIX.cpp, we can still break compatibility to R5.
Sounds good.
CU, Ingo
Other related posts:
