Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 3) Introduce a BPartitioningInfo with a similar method and a > > BPartition::GetPartitioningInfo() to get it. Similar to 2 b), with > > less syscalls though (one per GetPartitioningInfo()). > Well, somehow I managed to miss the fact that GetPartitioningInfo() > lives in BPartition, and that's the only thing about it I didn't like > (the imaginary fact that it *didn't* live there :-). So lets go with > 3) then. :-) Then let's do that - looks good IMO, too :-) Adios... Axel.