Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Axel Dörfler wrote: > > If you would be very disappointed, I could still make the changes, > > though :) > I would be grateful, if you do (and also adjust the unit tests > accordingly :-). Okay, I did so, but I couldn't run the unit tests under Dano; they stop with the message: FATAL: be_roster is not valid. Is the registrar running? I'll recheck under R5 soon. > > Bad, it should be: > > status_t BMimeType::GetTrackerIcon(BBitmap *icon, icon_size which); > Yep, that sounds better. Personally I wouldn't mind, if you added it. > But > it's more a question of whether you can bend the general policy not > to add > features with a clear conscience. ;-) > > If you do, please also add a unit test and an entry in > docs/develop/storage/Annotations. And don't forget to document that > using > the method will break an app's R5 compatibility. Sure, maybe an entry in our secret R2 list would do, too ;-) > > Hope you don't mind me talking to myself :) > Not at all, it's quite entertaining. ;-) Oh great, I was really worried ;-) Bye, Axel.