"Waldemar Kornewald" <wkornew@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Maybe we should think about moving to a distributed SCM like > Mercurial > (which is used by OpenSolaris, BTW)? That would make us more > independent of our host because we could have multiple hosts for our > repos (and mirrors, so they don't eat all our bandwidth). Also, what > I > really like about distributed systems is that non-members can easily > maintain their own patches and it gets a lot easier to contribute. > SVN > is very ugly in this regard (maintaining our Trac patches is like > hell...). Until we've reached a certain size, I think SVN is the best tool for the job for us. Besides it's numerous bugs, I'm very happy with SVN functionality-wise. Of course, it would be nice to create change-sets with SVN, so that one could divide the local changes into several commits, instead of having to do a huge commit after some time (when you even don't remember everything, ie. when being on vacation without any internet for a month or something). But since we usually have a working host... :-) > But moving to SF or Google is okay, too. It's time for slow repos > access, again. ;) > Maybe it's an omen that SF got their SVN service up at the same time > when BerliOS got problems? Nah... :) For the fun of it, I created an "Haiku" project at Google, but somehow it didn't convince me. It seems to be very limited, with very limited access. Plus, every committer would need a Google mail account. For now, BerliOS works again (who knows how long), and some day, the vacation of their employees will be over :-) I wouldn't like to change hosts again, if that would be possible. Bye, Axel.