[openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API

  • From: "vladimir reikine" <vreikine@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 14:06:14 -0400

Persistance is a virtue.
Ok, back to design comments:
I thought that PPPinterface class should be based on Interface class. 
This way you don't need to declare Up(), Down() and other common methods that 
would be inherirted from base class. You still can override them.


On Wed, 14 May 2003 18:21:50  
 Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I just had some time and completed the draft PPP kernel API. There is only
>> one comment, but the source should be understandable. It is mostly for the
>> add-ons.
>> All objects have a "K" prefix so that the names do not collide with the
>> later userland API.
>> You can download it here. Comments are welcome, of course.
>> http://zeus.mpg.goe.net/~tuvok/obosppp/kpppapi.zip
>These overwhelming responses tell me that: either my design total **** or it
>is boring or nobody is here or maybe you are not interested. :)
>This is only a small draft and it will change a little bit. I am not very
>sure about the K prefix. I could be enough to add it to the header. There
>are some classes missing. The encapsulators will become a new class. Should
>I use the OpenTracker style? It looks so ugly. :) I like the BeOS style
>(look at Application.h).
>Should I continue? Nathan?
>I will just code on...

Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail!

Other related posts: