[openbeosnetteam] Re: Everybody...
- From: "David Reid" <dreid@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:54:58 -0000
It's all organised :) Would we exclude you :(
david
----- Original Message -----
From: "Emmanuel Jacobs" <emmanuel.jacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:48 PM
Subject: [openbeosnetteam] Re: Everybody...
>
> Realy good idea :-)
> But can somebody report on this list what has been discussed or (why not)
a
> log of the IRC meeting ?
>
> Manu
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Reid" <dreid@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:47 PM
> Subject: [openbeosnetteam] Re: Everybody...
>
>
> >
> > A bunch of us were talking last night on IRC and we'll be there again in
a
> > while!
> >
> > irc.openprjects.com
> > #openbeosnetkit
> >
> > david
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Emmanuel Jacobs" <emmanuel.jacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:43 PM
> > Subject: [openbeosnetteam] Everybody...
> >
> >
> > >
> > > ...welcomes Bruno G. Albuquerque from Dr. Zoidberg Enterprises :-)
> > >
> > > Thanks for joining this list.
> > >
> > > Emmanuel
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Erik Reid" <reide@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:27 PM
> > > Subject: [openbeosnetteam] Re: Me as well...
> > >
> > >
> > > > Quoth "David Reid":
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Forgive me for looking like a fool, but what are teams, and
> shutdown?
> > > :)
> > > > >> (I have done socket code on unix before, just don't recognize the
> > > terms,
> > > > >> haven't done anything to rough.)
> > > > >
> > > > >shutdown is a call to shutdown a socket...
> > > > >
> > > > >teams are what beos calls threads under a particular process, if
that
> > > makes
> > > > >it any clearer :) Look in the bebook!
> > > >
> > > > Makes sense. Thanks! :)
> > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >Would be Nice To Haves
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >- IPv6
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I'm definitely interested in this, as well as a few other IP
specs
> > such
> > > as
> > > > >> bridging and tunneling using a few different methods(especially
> > > IPSec!).
> > > > >> I think BeOS already did NAT?
> > > > >
> > > > >Yes, but I think we need to look at that. It would be cool to add
> > > > >hooks/support for pf as well...
> > > >
> > > > Definitely some form of packet filtering. Is there a tcpdump for
BeOS
> > > currently?
> > > >
> > > > >> Now, I don't have a lot of experience with deep OS stuff, but
> > wouldn't
> > > it
> > > > >be
> > > > >> possible to have a set of 'emulation' libraries or something,
which
> > > could
> > > > >be
> > > > >> written on top of our OpenBeOS library in order to provide binary
> > > > >compatibility,
> > > > >> but still let us advance R1 in small ways?
> > > > >
> > > > >I guess so. I wouldn't be interested in writing them, but no doubt
> > some
> > > > >other people in need of self flagellation will be.
> > > >
> > > > Fair enough. I suspect we'll get leaned on from the rest of the
> > OpenBeOS
> > > > team to have binary compatibility, which is really the only reason I
> say
> > > it. :P
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
Other related posts:
