Realy good idea :-) But can somebody report on this list what has been discussed or (why not) a log of the IRC meeting ? Manu ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Reid" <dreid@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:47 PM Subject: [openbeosnetteam] Re: Everybody... > > A bunch of us were talking last night on IRC and we'll be there again in a > while! > > irc.openprjects.com > #openbeosnetkit > > david > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Emmanuel Jacobs" <emmanuel.jacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:43 PM > Subject: [openbeosnetteam] Everybody... > > > > > > ...welcomes Bruno G. Albuquerque from Dr. Zoidberg Enterprises :-) > > > > Thanks for joining this list. > > > > Emmanuel > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Erik Reid" <reide@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: <openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:27 PM > > Subject: [openbeosnetteam] Re: Me as well... > > > > > > > Quoth "David Reid": > > > >> > > > >> Forgive me for looking like a fool, but what are teams, and shutdown? > > :) > > > >> (I have done socket code on unix before, just don't recognize the > > terms, > > > >> haven't done anything to rough.) > > > > > > > >shutdown is a call to shutdown a socket... > > > > > > > >teams are what beos calls threads under a particular process, if that > > makes > > > >it any clearer :) Look in the bebook! > > > > > > Makes sense. Thanks! :) > > > > > > >> > > > >> >Would be Nice To Haves > > > >> > > > > >> >- IPv6 > > > >> > > > >> I'm definitely interested in this, as well as a few other IP specs > such > > as > > > >> bridging and tunneling using a few different methods(especially > > IPSec!). > > > >> I think BeOS already did NAT? > > > > > > > >Yes, but I think we need to look at that. It would be cool to add > > > >hooks/support for pf as well... > > > > > > Definitely some form of packet filtering. Is there a tcpdump for BeOS > > currently? > > > > > > >> Now, I don't have a lot of experience with deep OS stuff, but > wouldn't > > it > > > >be > > > >> possible to have a set of 'emulation' libraries or something, which > > could > > > >be > > > >> written on top of our OpenBeOS library in order to provide binary > > > >compatibility, > > > >> but still let us advance R1 in small ways? > > > > > > > >I guess so. I wouldn't be interested in writing them, but no doubt > some > > > >other people in need of self flagellation will be. > > > > > > Fair enough. I suspect we'll get leaned on from the rest of the > OpenBeOS > > > team to have binary compatibility, which is really the only reason I say > > it. :P > > > > > > > > > >