[nikonf4] Re: guns

  • From: "WOC" <woc2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <nikonf4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 14:26:10 -0400

Again, kinda proves that point, more laws is not what is needed.

For some reason a segment of the populous seem to think that adding laws will 
make all things better when in fact attending to the issue is the real answer.  
We don’t want mental facilities because it makes someone feel bad.  Better to 
flood the streets of big cities with challenged people to live on the streets, 
commit crimes they are not conscience of and the like.  And best of all, to 
reproduce at will.  But then we also think it’s a right to create scads of 
children we are ill equipped to properly raise.  

Also interesting how many of these ‘unbalanced’ shooters can figure out which 
is the best place to get maximum carnage by going to places where guns are not 
allowed to help insure no one might have one and cut our right to be famous for 
15 minutes short. 

You say they are all unbalanced, and I am inclined to agree that you have to be 
a bit whacky to do it, but I do not agree that it is always the acceptable 
defense that bleeding heart folks do.


From: nikonf4-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nikonf4-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Redacted sender "WiltW@xxxxxxx" for DMARC
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 1:42 PM
To: woc2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; nikonf4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [nikonf4] Re: guns


The issue, based upon who has been involved in the many shootings taking place 
on school grounds and elsewhere, is NOT REGULATION, and is also NOT ENFORCEMENT 
of existing laws, but is the issue of MENTAL HEALTH...the shooters have all 
been unbalanced!




In a message dated 6/16/2014 9:36:41 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, 
woc2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

The Supreme Court dealt a rare blow to the gun lobby Monday by ruling that 
purchasers must report when they are buying firearms for other people.


Well, well, well.

Perhaps they are finally getting serious about this crap.  They don’t need more 
laws, far too many already, just need to enforce the laws that are already 
there.  A novel thought would be to standardize gun crime laws across the 
country and actually put little Johnnie and Janine away when they commit a 
crime instead of letting them off the hook because they didn’t win a prize in 
3rd grade and now suffer for life.  A good start, have a gun at a crime scene? 
Minimum 5 years.  Pull a gun at a crime scene? Minimum 10 years. Shoot a gun at 
a crime scene and wound someone?   Minimum 20 years.  Kill someone?  Life, or 
death.  The liberal crew say that strong punishment is not a determent to 
committing crime, but one thing is for sure.  They person with the strong 
punishment is deterred, they won’t commit any for a long time. 



No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4592 / Virus Database: 3964/7686 - Release Date: 06/16/14

Other related posts: