[nikonf4] Re: Wedding photography

  • From: "John Osthus" <josthus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <nikonf4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 16:31:08 -0600

Um ..this isn’t a real trial is it?

It was entertaining but this is a TV show, right?

My favorite part was the hot bailiff with the sidearm.

Best,

JO

-----Original Message-----
From: nikonf4-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nikonf4-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of tigermike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 1:39 PM
To: nikonf4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [nikonf4] Re: Wedding photography

What's even funnier is that he always says this too.  "You know, your mouth and 
attitude aren't helping you any.  I suggest you just be quiet."  Of course, 
they never do.  
I loved her response when he said he used to do photography "yeah and when was 
THAT?!?!"


-----Original Message-----
>From: Jay Paxton <JayPax@xxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Jan 4, 2011 11:08 AM
>To: nikonf4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [nikonf4] Re: Wedding photography
>
>And of course, the defendants violated the first rule of being in court:
>
>
>"Don't p*** off the judge by being a smart mouth."
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nikonf4-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nikonf4-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>On Behalf Of tigermike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 10:03 AM
>To: nikonf4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [nikonf4] Re: Wedding photography
>
>The defendants were lying, they were hoping that saying "we didn't meet
>her at a wedding show" would be enough to break the plaintiff's case.
>Problem is, some people are just plain naive and take verbal promises of
>"you will get professional prints" as that.  As the old addage goes,
>"you get what you paid for."
>"How fast is your lens?  You are using a Rebel XT, and you are a pro?
>Where's your 1-series, 7D, 5D, hell 10D?  The Xt is your base model!
>Where's your 28-70?  How can you get a decent photo with such a slow
>lens, the cheapest you can buy!"  LMAO, I loved it!
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Mark Stein <mjstein63@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Sent: Jan 3, 2011 5:39 PM
>>To: nikonf4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: [nikonf4] Re: Wedding photography
>>
>>Nice to see bad pros slapped down, but the plaintiff made her own 
>>mistakes...
>>
>>Why was there no mention of a contract, which should have listed what 
>>the deliverables were?   If she didn't meet them at a wedding show,
>then 
>>did she really see samples of their work?
>>
>>
>>
>>On 1/3/2011 11:15 AM, Frank Armstrong wrote:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIiH9uxdE5M
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>



Other related posts: