[nikonf4] Re: D400

  • From: Koichi Mac <nikonf3tmd4@xxxxxxx>
  • To: nikonf4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 04:49:41 -0700

        If the camera is that great, why the hell did Nikon assign 7000?  
Should have been more like D400.

Koichi Yasutani - a.k.a. Steve + MP
Lakewood, WA U.S.A.
2010 / 11 / 6           04:50 PDT

On Nov 5, 2010, at 1804 , Eric Welch wrote:

> It's much better than the D300s. It's 16.2 megapixels. It has a much more 
> advanced sensor and much higher quality ISO performance. Autofocus is really 
> accurate and fast. The exposure meter has twice the pixels as the D300s. It's 
> now the second highest resolution camera Nikon makes behind the D3X which 
> costs at least about $6,000 more. And it does 1080p 24fps video. The only 
> Nikon that does. For $1,200.

> On Nov 5, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Koichi Mac wrote:
>> What's so special about D7000 over D300?  I thought it was a mere slight 
>> upgrade of D5000, but maybe I should change mind over it.

Other related posts: