If the camera is that great, why the hell did Nikon assign 7000? Should have been more like D400. Koichi Yasutani - a.k.a. Steve + MP Lakewood, WA U.S.A. 2010 / 11 / 6 04:50 PDT On Nov 5, 2010, at 1804 , Eric Welch wrote: > It's much better than the D300s. It's 16.2 megapixels. It has a much more > advanced sensor and much higher quality ISO performance. Autofocus is really > accurate and fast. The exposure meter has twice the pixels as the D300s. It's > now the second highest resolution camera Nikon makes behind the D3X which > costs at least about $6,000 more. And it does 1080p 24fps video. The only > Nikon that does. For $1,200. > On Nov 5, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Koichi Mac wrote: >> What's so special about D7000 over D300? I thought it was a mere slight >> upgrade of D5000, but maybe I should change mind over it.