[net-gold] Secrecy News -- 04/21/10

From: "David P. Dillard" <jwne@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Net-Gold <Net-Gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Temple University Net-Gold Archive <net-gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Temple Gold Discussion Group <TEMPLE-GOLD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Net-Gold <net-gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sean Grigsby <myarchives1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Educator Gold <Educator-Gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Educator Gold <Educator-Gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, K12AdminLIFE <K12AdminLIFE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Net-Platinum <net-platinum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Net-Gold @ Nabble" <ml-node+3172864-337556105@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, MediaMentor <mediamentor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Digital Divide Diversity MLS <mls-digitaldivide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, net-gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, NetGold <netgold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:38:51 -0400 (EDT)





.




Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:29:08 -0400
From: Steven Aftergood <saftergood@xxxxxxx>
To: saftergood@xxxxxxx
Subject: Secrecy News -- 04/21/10 (alt list)



SECRECY NEWS
from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy


Volume 2010, Issue No. 32
April 21, 2010



Secrecy News Blog:

http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/



**      STATE DEPT SEEKS PUBLIC INPUT ON HUMAN RIGHTS IN U.S.

**      PRIVACY IMPACT OF INTERNET SECURITY IS CLASSIFIED, NSA SAYS

**      ACTIVITIES OF THE SENATE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, 1976-2009




STATE DEPT SEEKS PUBLIC INPUT ON HUMAN RIGHTS IN U.S.



The U.S. State Department is inviting members of the public to present their
concerns about human rights in the United States as part of the Universal
Periodic Review (UPR) process, in which the human rights records of all UN
Member States are to be reviewed.

"In the pursuit of a transparent and effective UPR process, the Department
of State is encouraging the American public, including non-governmental
organizations and civil society more broadly, to provide input regarding
human rights in the United States directly to the Department of State."

"Your feedback is vital for us to better gauge the U.S. human rights
situation now, and how protection of human rights can be improved in our
country and around the world," the State Department website said. "We look
forward to receiving your comments."

        http://www.state.gov/g/drl/upr/index.htm

The Federation of American Scientists asked the State Department to turn its
attention to those cases where a resolution of alleged human rights
violations has been barred by the government's use of the state secrets
privilege.

"There are innocent individuals who have been swept up in U.S. Government
counterterrorism operations, wrongly detained, 'rendered' surreptitiously to
foreign countries, subjected to extreme physical and mental stress, or
otherwise wronged," we wrote.  "In some cases, like those of persons such as
Maher Arar and Khaled el-Masri, efforts to seek legal remedies have been
blocked by the Government's invocation of the state secrets privilege. As a
result, the alleged abuses committed in such cases remain unresolved, and
there is no way for the affected individuals to be made whole."

"If the judicial process in such cases is foreclosed by the state secrets
privilege, then an alternate procedure should be created to rectify the
wrongs that may have been committed," we suggested.


PRIVACY IMPACT OF INTERNET SECURITY IS CLASSIFIED, NSA SAYS

New technologies could be used to improve internet security but the impact
of those technologies on personal privacy is classified information, the
director of the National Security Agency told Congress last week.

"How could the Internet be designed differently to provide much greater
inherent security?" the Senate Armed Services Committee asked Lt. General
Keith Alexander, who has been nominated to lead the new U.S. Cyber Command.

"The design of the Internet is - and will continue to evolve - based on
technological advancements. These new technologies will enhance mobility
and, if properly implemented, security," replied Gen. Alexander in his
written answers in advance of an April 15 Committee hearing.

"What would the impact be on privacy, both pro and con?" the Committee
continued.

The answer to that question was "provided in the classified supplement" to
the General's response, and was not made public (see question 27).

        http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2010_hr/041510alexander-qfr.pdf

"It is astounding that Lt. Gen. Alexander's remarks on the impact on privacy
of future modifications to the Internet under his command should be withheld
from the public," wrote Jared Kaprove and John Verdi of the Electronic
Privacy Information Center (EPIC), especially given the President's declared
commitment to upholding privacy protection in the nation's cybersecurity
policy.

Consequently, EPIC filed a Freedom of Information Act request seeking
disclosure of the classified supplement to General Alexander's answers.

        http://epic.org/2010/04/epic-demands-release-of-classi.html

"There is a clear public interest in making known the Director's views on
this critical topic," EPIC wrote in its request.


ACTIVITIES OF THE SENATE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, 1976-2009

The Senate Intelligence Committee has posted a collection of its biennial
public reports on the Committee's activities, from the first report in 1976
to the latest in 2009, providing a retrospective survey of intelligence
controversies past and present.

        http://intelligence.senate.gov/pubactivities.html

"The committee has unintentionally produced a profoundly biased political
document," complained the late Sen. Daniel P. Moynihan in a statement
appended to the very first report in 1976.  "The committee reports on a
world in which very simply, the values which the United States hopefully
stands for do not seem to be threatened by any activity save the activities
of the U.S. Government.... Nowhere is the Committee for State Security of
the Soviet Union (the KGB) even alluded to. There is a pattern of avoidance
of the reality of totalitarian threat throughout this document."

        http://intelligence.senate.gov/pdfs/95217.pdf

"I believe that my colleague misses the point," replied Sen. Joseph Biden in
the same 1976 report.  "At the heart of what is wrong with the intelligence
community and what indeed has caused many of the abuses we have seen is the
fact that most officials of the intelligence community do not know what they
should and should not be doing.... We will not solve that problem by
restating the obvious, that the Soviets operate a very effective
intelligence service, unfettered by the restrictions of a vibrant
constitution."





_______________________________________________






Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the Federation
of American Scientists.

The Secrecy News Blog is at:
     http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/

To SUBSCRIBE to Secrecy News, go to:
     http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/subscribe.html

To UNSUBSCRIBE, go to
     http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/unsubscribe.html

OR email your request to saftergood@xxxxxxx

Secrecy News is archived at:
     http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/index.html

Support the FAS Project on Government Secrecy with a donation:
     http://www.fas.org/member/donate_today.html






_______________________





Steven Aftergood
Project on Government Secrecy
Federation of American Scientists
web:    www.fas.org/sgp/index.html
email:  saftergood@xxxxxxx
voice:  (202) 454-4691

[net-gold] Secrecy News -- 04/21/10

Other related posts: