[ncsc-moths] Re: [ncsc-moths] Re: [ncsc-moths] raw pic 9254 – Acronicta afflicta – Afflicted Dagger Moth 6/2/13
- From: Doug Allen <dougk4ly@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:10:48 -0400
Ken,
I'll have to to remember that. I was able to change the tint to grey with
Picasa.
I have a question for you and others. One of the other limitations of my
record shots is that I don't know or often have any recollection of size of
the moth. I always use the same 4.5 mm focal length (25mm focal length in
35mm film) with a Panasonic DMC-DRC which is better for moths than the
Canon SX-40 I use for butterflies and birds.. How do others record
relative size?
Doug
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:47 PM, kjchilds <kjchilds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Doug,
>
> I took a look at your pic in Photoshop and the green tint isn't the
> natural color of the moth. It's an artifact of the underexposure.
>
> Ken Childs
> Henderson, TN
> Chester County
>
> http://tinyurl.com/FinishFlagFarmsMoths
> http://www.finishflagfarms.com
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Doug Allen <dougk4ly@xxxxxxxxx>
> *To:* ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 24, 2013 2:51 PM
> *Subject:* [ncsc-moths] raw pic 9254 – Acronicta afflicta – Afflicted
> Dagger Moth 6/2/13
>
> Thanks Ken and Hugh,
> Here's the original pic without any tuning. Yes, I think its green!
> Two views of a micro I haven't try to find yet- looks like it's
> related to a shrimp!
> A green cutie and a scary predator that came to the black lights.
> Doug
>
>
>
Other related posts:
- » [ncsc-moths] Re: [ncsc-moths] Re: [ncsc-moths] raw pic 9254 – Acronicta afflicta – Afflicted Dagger Moth 6/2/13 - Doug Allen
