Merrill, I will try to work on my Tortricid more this afternoon. Regarding the Rhyacionia, I think the genus should be changed to Frustrana. But then there are countless other candidates waiting in line for that designation. On second thought, let’s just refer to all moths by that name! Harry From: J. Merrill Lynch Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 10:45 AM To: ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [ncsc-moths] Re: Unidentified Tortricid Moth Harry, I agree your bug is in the subfamily Eucosmini; the closest match I see on MPG is #2946, Phaneta apacheana. However, the name suggests it is a western species and the closest record to here is from OK. I got a report from Parker Backstrom that he too is seeing Rhyacionia--they're all over the place! Like you, he thinks his bug most resembles R. duplana. Here we go again! Merrill On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Harry Wilson <harrywilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: I believe the moth in my photos from last night is probably a Eucosmini, but I have not been able to find it through MPG or BG. I believe the last image, 7720 (taken Sat. night) is probably the same species. Any ideas, anyone? I also had a very striking Roadside Sallow, quite a few Green Cloverworm Moths, an Alternate Woodling, and my dear friend, R. frustrana. Also on Saturday I had a Reddish Speckled Dart. Harry Wilson Zebulon, NC -- J. Merrill Lynch Echo Valley Farm Watauga County, NC Elevation: 3,400 feet