[ncsc-moths] Re: Fwd: Re: Anicla forbesi unsure
- From: Hugh McGuinness <hdmcguinness@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:55:56 -0400
Yep, I think you are probably correct on that ID.
Hugh
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Jackie Nelson <ephemeropterae@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Hey, can someone confirm my ID? Paul got his moths confirmed and I get
> ignored. Hmmpf!
> Jackie :)
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jackie Nelson <ephemeropterae@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [ncsc-moths] Re: Anicla forbesi unsure
> To: ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Slippery Dart (Anicla lubricans) was ruled out only for lack of data -
> range, additional photos, description. Plus, Hugh McGuinness' photo seemed
> a reasonable match for A. forbesi also.
> I'm willing to be corrected of course!
>
> Only have MPG and BG as resources right now.
>
> Photo attached
>
> Jackie
> NW N. Carolina
> S. Appalachians
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:22 AM, parker backstrom <
> dpbackstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Jackie and Paul –****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I’ve since deleted your shot so I can’t go back to look at it but how was
>> Slippery Dart (Anicla lubricans) ruled out? That’s what I first thought
>> when I saw the photo … but I could be mistaken, obviously.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Parker****
>>
>> Bear Creek, NC****
>>
>> ** **
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* ncsc-moths-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>> ncsc-moths-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Jackie Nelson
>> *Sent:* Saturday, August 27, 2011 11:44 AM
>> *To:* ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* [ncsc-moths] Re: Anicla forbesi unsure****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Thank you, Paul. Onward to 450!
>> Jackie****
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Paul <pandlscharf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> ****
>>
>> Looks like it to me and is pretty much the same as my photos. Paul****
>>
>>
>>
>> ****
>>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
