Yes, this is praefectellus for the reason stated and also b/c there is no white dash coming off the big white streak distally on the posterior side. Hugh On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Paul <pandlscharf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ** > > I'm leaning towards 5357.Crambus leachellus on this one, 28 Apr 2012, > Warren Cty, NC. However, if I read Peterson's book correctly, the pointed > white streak is not touching the basal section of costa, So do I just have > another 5355 C. praefaectellus.? Really appreciate comments on this one. > Thanks, Paul > -- Hugh McGuinness Washington, D.C.