[ncsc-moths] Re: Cameraria arcuella, 0807
- From: Jackie Nelson <ephemeropterae@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:57:17 -0400
Kyle,
Are you coming to the Lep course in July?
Jackie
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Kyle Kittelberger
<kkturtledude@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Thanks Harry!
>
> Kyle
>
> *From:* Harry Wilson <harrywilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *To:* ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Sent:* Sunday, June 24, 2012 8:21 AM
>
> *Subject:* [ncsc-moths] Re: Cameraria arcuella, 0807
>
> Good work, Kyle! And way to hang in there, insisting that your moth was
> not one of our normal species. Glad that you received the answer you were
> seeking.
>
> Harry
>
> *From:* Kyle Kittelberger <kkturtledude@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Sent:* Saturday, June 23, 2012 10:23 PM
> *To:* ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [ncsc-moths] Re: Cameraria arcuella, 0807
>
> Well I was close! Someone on bugguide who knows someone familiar with
> micros in this genus said that it is *Cameraria fletcherella*, 0820. This
> is an even better find than what I thought it was, as *C. fletcherella*has
> only been recorded, it appears, from Michigan and Illinois. Cool!
>
> Kyle
>
> *From:* Kyle Kittelberger <kkturtledude@xxxxxxxxx>
> *To:* Moth List <ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Sent:* Friday, June 22, 2012 7:11 PM
> *Subject:* [ncsc-moths] Cameraria arcuella, 0807
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> Last week I photographed this micro moth, which I feel confident is *Cameraria
> arcuella, *0807. It has been recorded in Virginia, but I don't think it
> has been found in NC before. Has anyone else seen this before?
>
> Kyle
>
>
>
>
>
--
<")
( \
/ |``
Jackie
Other related posts:
