[nasional_list] [ppiindia] Muslims and the West: Bridging the Gap
- From: "Ambon" <sea@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <"Undisclosed-Recipient:;"@freelists.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:42:43 +0100
** Forum Nasional Indonesia PPI India Mailing List **
** Untuk bergabung dg Milis Nasional kunjungi:
** Situs Milis: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/ **
** Beasiswa dalam negeri dan luar negeri S1 S2 S3 dan post-doctoral
scholarship, kunjungi
http://informasi-beasiswa.blogspot.com
**http://www.arabnews.com/?page=7§ion=0&article=79012&d=10&m=3&y=2006
Friday, 10, March, 2006 (09, Safar, 1427)
Muslims and the West: Bridging the Gap
Adil Salahi, Arab News
Recent events in Europe and the Muslim world have highlighted
- yet again - the gulf that separates two great cultures. The publication of
the cartoons satirizing the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and the angry
feelings this released across the Muslim world presented the gap in garish
colors. People in the West feel unable to understand the depth of the anger
that the cartoons generated. They are just mediocre cartoons satirizing a man
who lived fourteen centuries ago. Publishing them was in poor taste, perhaps,
but they should not directly affect anyone alive today. Westerners may feel
that the angry demonstrations taking place as far apart as Jakarta and Rabat
show how strange the workings of the Muslim mind are. What do these
demonstrators want? An apology by the Danish and Norwegian governments? Why?
Neither government was responsible for the cartoons or their publication. When
demonstrating evolved into burning embassies, it placed itself outside
both the law and the comprehensible.
The newspapers insist that the whole thing was an exercise of
the sacred human right to freedom; in this case freedom of expression. Many
Muslims ask why anybody's freedom of expression should acquire greater sanctity
than the religious sanctities of millions? Muslims revere Muhammad as the
bearer of a message from God, respect him as a social reformer and political
leader and love him as a man and a role model. In all these capacities they
would go to great lengths to defend him. What freedom, and what expression,
then, could be given higher importance? Moreover, Muslims see no virtue in the
freedom of expression expressed in these cartoons. This is merely freedom to
hurl abuse. And is it not the case that one person's freedom stops where it
encroaches on another person's rights. We all have the right to be treated with
respect, so where do these newspapers get the right to ridicule and insult the
Prophet - the man we hold dearer than ourselves?
The European papers that published the cartoons in solidarity
with the Danish paper said they wanted Muslims to know they cannot be exempt
from satire. But for Muslims the cartoons were sheer ridicule. They reflected
nothing that the Prophet had ever said or done. They might refer to some ideas
held by some Muslims; but none of those ideas were expressed by the Prophet. So
they ask: If the papers only want to critique Muslims, why do they target the
Prophet?
Had these cartoons been directed against someone alive today,
that person might have a case to sue the papers for libel. How come, then, that
Western laws protect Tom, Dick and Harry but leave the man who is the object of
every Muslim's love and veneration vulnerable to senseless abuse? The logic is
straightforward to a Muslim who is under divine command not to mock the
religious symbols of any religion, including idols and similar objects of
worship.
Muslims see the West's selective application of some of its
enshrined freedoms. They ask: What freedom of expression are we speaking about
when US President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair discuss
the bombing of the Arabic television channel Al-Jazeerah? In fact, the
coalition actually bombed Al-Jazeerah's offices in Afghanistan and Iraq and
killed Arab journalists working in Baghdad. What freedom of expression
sentences Al-Jazeera's Tayseer Allouni to seven years imprisonment? One of the
pieces of "evidence" against him was that he interviewed Osama Bin Ladin:
Wouldn't every Western journalist think of that as a scoop?
Such double standards are often cited when discussing
relations between the West and the Muslim world. Recent examples abound, the
latest being the attitude of the West to Hamas winning the Palestinian
parliamentary elections. Everyone agrees that the elections were conducted
freely and produced a clear winner. But the US and the European Union declared
immediately that they would not deal with Hamas and that they would stop the
funds already committed to the Palestinians. The message is that there is a
limit to acceptable democracy: Elections must never produce a result the West
disapproves of. What would the German, the French, or the British electorate
think if their politicians tried to apply the same idea to them: We will have
general elections, but they must produce a specific government? What is the
likely result of a British opinion poll asking: "What would you say if
elections in Northern Ireland produce a clear win for Sinn Fein?" Most
respondents
would probably say "good for them". Why is it not good for the Palestinians
that Hamas has won a free election? Fixing election results is common practice
in the Arab world. Do we find in the attitude of Western democracies to the
Hamas win a reminder of the attitude of Arab governments to elections? In other
words, how far have these Western democracies already gone in borrowing
policies and practices from Arab dictatorships? Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib,
Al-Jazeerah, Allouni and now the Palestinian elections tell their different
stories, but they all confirm such an unwelcome traffic. Arabs and Muslims in
general have traditionally longed for the day when the freedoms of the
democratic West are practiced in their own countries. Now they are in despair
as they see the traffic going the other way, with many Western countries
importing ideas and practices that are dictatorial in nature under cover of the
"War on Terror".
There is no doubt that the gulf between the two cultures is
wide. Nor is there any doubt in my mind that it is bridgeable. What is needed
is for both sides to understand and practice their basic principles: They will
be surprised at how much they have in common. For example, the West rightly
takes pride in its freedom. Well, Muslims should have no problem with freedom.
Notable scholars of the Qur'an declare that freedom is the first human right
under Islam. They cite in evidence a principle stated twice in the Qur'an:
"Oppression is worse than killing." (2: 191 & 217)
The Prophet is instructed in the Qur'an to say to all those
who will not believe his message: "You have your religion, I have mine." (109:
6) The Qur'an describes itself as the message of truth sent by God. It
immediately follows this description with the statement: "Let him who will,
believe in it, and let him who will, reject it." (18: 29)
Why do many Muslims not reflect this emphasis on freedom in
their attitude to others? The basic reason is that most Muslim countries have
been living under dictatorships for several generations; this has left them
socially embattled.
There is a general feeling among Westerners that democracy is
incompatible with Islam. This notion is confirmed by the activities of some
fringe Muslim groups. Yet the essence of democracy, i.e. consultative and
representative government, is endorsed in two definitive Qur'anic statements
one of which may be translated as: "Take counsel with them in all matters of
public concern." (3: 159) This is a command to the Prophet and to every Muslim
ruler to institutionalize public consultation over all matters.
Gender equality is another important issue with which Islam
has no problem. Islam addresses its message to both men and women and treats
them on absolutely equal basis. The Prophet states: "Women are the full sisters
of men."
The gap between the two cultures is bridgeable, but much work
is urgently needed on both sides. This can be done through dialogue based on
mutual respect, as taught by Islam, Christianity and the best of the humanist
traditions in both cultures.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg
Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:
1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Reading only, http://dear.to/ppi
4. Satu email perhari: ppiindia-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
5. No-email/web only: ppiindia-nomail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
6. kembali menerima email: ppiindia-normal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ppiindia-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
** Forum Nasional Indonesia PPI India Mailing List **
** Untuk bergabung dg Milis Nasional kunjungi:
** Situs Milis: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/ **
** Beasiswa dalam negeri dan luar negeri S1 S2 S3 dan post-doctoral
scholarship, kunjungi
http://informasi-beasiswa.blogspot.com **
Other related posts:
- » [nasional_list] [ppiindia] Muslims and the West: Bridging the Gap
