[nas-2000] Re: Poor performance ?

  • From: philipp Wehrheim <flipstar@xxxxxxx>
  • To: nas-2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 22:05:33 +0200

:-P

Tom Haukap schrieb:
> I don't want to disapoint anynone and remember that I have another box but I
> get around 7 MB/s out of the box (nice phrase):
> 
> local: outlook.pst remote: outlook.pst
> 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode (|||1048|)
> 150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for outlook.pst (114409472 bytes)
> 100% 
> |***************************************************************************
> ********|   109 MB    7.30 MB/s    00:14
> 226 Transfer complete.
> 114409472 bytes received in 00:14 (7.30 MB/s)
> ftp> 
> 
> 
> Am 15.05.2007 21:41 Uhr schrieb "philipp Wehrheim" unter <flipstar@xxxxxxx>:
> 
>> ok can please somebody try this:
>>
>> stop the ftp-server
>>
>> /usr/hddapp/etc/rc.d/S91proftpd stop
>>
>> delete this
>> rm -rf /var/run/proftpd/
>>
>> and restart
>> /usr/hddapp/etc/rc.d/S91proftpd start
>>
>> is it now faster for you?
>>
>> I get ~4,5 MB/s
>>
>> Aurelien schrieb:
>>> Nothing to do with the log detail level that you set in your
>>> proftpd.conf file?
>>>
>>> philipp Wehrheim a écrit :
>>>> Hi again,
>>>>
>>>> I found the main differense even though I don't know
>>>> how to fix it
>>>>
>>>> proftpd on tinky when running with -d 10 -n
>>>>
>>>> does lots of
>>>> icybox.local (192.168.10.10[192.168.10.10]) - FS: using system write()
>>>>
>>>> which the orig fw doesn't ...
>>>> guess thats the problem
>>>>
>>>> anybody got a clue?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Aurel schrieb:
>>>>  
>>>>> Is it also possible to get old proftpd libs (I know that some
>>>>> librairies have
>>>>> been overwritten with latest proftpd version)?
>>>>> Indeed, I would like to test the full "old proftpd package" on tinky
>>>>> box.
>>>>>
>>>>> (By the way, can you the list of new list that are used with the
>>>>> tinky firmware?
>>>>> If the porblem is not coming from the binaries, it can come from new
>>>>> libs...)
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards !
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Selon "flipstar@xxxxxxx" <flipstar@xxxxxxx>:
>>>>>
>>>>>    
>>>>>> here it is ..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aurel schrieb:
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does someone has the original proftpd binary file ?
>>>>>>> I would like to try on my tinky box to see my performances.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Selon philipp Wehrheim <flipstar@xxxxxxx>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>        
>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> by the way today i visited the kiss webpage the kiss 1600 looks cool
>>>>>>>> but my question is what exectly can you do with the kissdx
>>>>>>>> and dos the kiss support upnp(av)?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>> flip
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Julius Loman schrieb:
>>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 09:32:32PM +0200, philipp Wehrheim
>>>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>> <flipstar@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>>>> there are now 2 new ipk's lsof and strace ...
>>>>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>>> could you add the kissdx and relevant packages to your web please
>>>>>>>>> ? just
>>>>>>>>> if somebody is interested.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> i've sent you an email two days ago with the link -
>>>>>>>>> http://lomo.kyberia.net/nas2000/.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> regards
>>>>>>>>> julius
>>>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>>>> philipp Wehrheim schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> today I did some stacing and compared tinky's and raidsonic's
>>>>>>>>>>> proftp
>>>>>>>>>>> work.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> when running proftp (the same binary) on tinky it looks like this.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ................
>>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
>>>>>>>>>>> alarm(219)                              = 0
>>>>>>>>>>> write(11,
>>>>>>>>>>> "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
>>>>>>>>>>> 8192) = 8192
>>>>>>>>>>> gettimeofday({67811881, 150000}, NULL)  = 0
>>>>>>>>>>> select(14, [13], [], NULL, {1, 0})      = 1 (in [13], left {1, 0})
>>>>>>>>>>> read(13,
>>>>>>>>>>> "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
>>>>>>>>>>> 8192) = 8192
>>>>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 219
>>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
>>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
>>>>>>>>>>> alarm(219)                              = 0
>>>>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 219
>>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
>>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
>>>>>>>>>>> alarm(219)                              = 0
>>>>>>>>>>> write(11,
>>>>>>>>>>> "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
>>>>>>>>>>> 8192) = 8192
>>>>>>>>>>> gettimeofday({67811881, 510000}, NULL)  = 0
>>>>>>>>>>> select(14, [13], [], NULL, {1, 0})      = 1 (in [13], left {1, 0})
>>>>>>>>>>> read(13,
>>>>>>>>>>> "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
>>>>>>>>>>> 8192) = 8192
>>>>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 219
>>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
>>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
>>>>>>>>>>> alarm(219)                              = 0
>>>>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 219
>>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
>>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
>>>>>>>>>>> .............
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> and on the raidsonic fw like this
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ...............
>>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101373
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> alarm(72)                               = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 72
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101373
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101373
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> alarm(72)                               = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> sendfile64(9, 11, [193131480], 4294967295) = 65536
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 72
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101373
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101373
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> alarm(72)                               = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 72
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101373
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101374
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> alarm(72)                               = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> sendfile64(9, 11, [193164248], 4294967295) = 65536
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 72
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101374
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101374
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> alarm(72)                               = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 72
>>>>>>>>>>> .................
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> to me it looks like the reads and write proftpd is doing when
>>>>>>>>>>> executed
>>>>>>>>>>> on tinky eats up lots of time ....
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Im not sure here it comes from ...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Anybody having an idea?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Aurelien schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>>>>> Good Mornin' everybody !
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Here are mine. they are very poor and i'm still investigating
>>>>>>>>>>>> to find
>>>>>>>>>>>> some answers....
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Firmware:  tinky-2_3_2-mu-02.2.tgz
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>        
>>>>>> <http://www.nas-2000.org/download/tinky-2_3_2_mu_02/tinky-2_3_2-mu-02.2.tg
>>>>>> z>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>>> FTP:
>>>>>>>>>>>>    Up: 1.5MB/S
>>>>>>>>>>>>    Down: 1.8MB/S (==> 2.3MB/S with initial proftpd.conf file)
>>>>>>>>>>>> SMB:
>>>>>>>>>>>>    Up: 1.5MB/S
>>>>>>>>>>>>    Down: 1.8MB/S
>>>>>>>>>>>> File System:
>>>>>>>>>>>>    Ext3 (400GB)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Drive test results:
>>>>>>>>>>>>    root@NASDRIVE:~ # hdparm -tT /dev/hda1
>>>>>>>>>>>>    /dev/hda1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Timing buffer-cache reads:   124 MB in  2.04 seconds =  60.78
>>>>>>>>>>>>        
>>>>>> MB/sec
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Timing buffered disk reads:   26 MB in  3.00 seconds =   8.67
>>>>>>>>>>>>        
>>>>>> MB/sec
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer OS:
>>>>>>>>>>>>    XP, same results with ubuntu live cd
>>>>>>>>>>>> Network:
>>>>>>>>>>>>    NASBOX / LINKSYS WRT54G / ETHERNET
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>   philipp Wehrheim a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>        
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> here is my proftpd bechmark:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I used a 200M file created with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dd if=/dev/zero of=./200M_file bs=1M count=200
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> When I did these test samba, nfs and well yes proftd where
>>>>>>>>>>>>> running.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for tinky-2.3.2-mu-02.2 I get this results:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> upload
>>>>>>>>>>>>> time ncftpput -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.100 . ./200M_file
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./200M_file:                         200.00 MB    2.83 MB/s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> real    1m11.035s
>>>>>>>>>>>>> user    0m0.056s
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sys     0m1.140s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> download
>>>>>>>>>>>>> time ncftpget -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.100 . ./200M_file
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 200M_file:                           200.00 MB    5.83 MB/s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> real    0m34.539s
>>>>>>>>>>>>> user    0m0.400s
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sys     0m4.956s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for raidsonic fw 2_3_2-IB-2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> upload
>>>>>>>>>>>>> time ncftpput -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.99 . ./200M_file
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./200M_file:                         200.00 MB    5.65 MB/s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> real    0m35.999s
>>>>>>>>>>>>> user    0m0.072s
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sys     0m0.984s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> download
>>>>>>>>>>>>> time ncftpget -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.99 . ./200M_file
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 200M_file:                           200.00 MB    4.23 MB/s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> real    0m47.516s
>>>>>>>>>>>>> user    0m0.456s
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sys     0m4.844s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I think Tinky is doing quite well when it comes to download
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but is very slow with uploads.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running proftd -V on the tinky fw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Features:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     + Autoshadow support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     + Controls support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     + curses support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     - Developer support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     - DSO support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     - IPv6 support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     + Largefile support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     + ncurses support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     - POSIX ACL support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     + Shadow file support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     + Sendfile support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Tunable Options:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_BUFFER_SIZE = 1024
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_GLOBBING_MAX = 8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_HASH_TABLE_SIZE = 40
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_NEW_POOL_SIZE = 512
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_RCVBUFSZ = 87380
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_BUFFER_SIZE = 80
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_SCRUB_TIMER = 30
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SELECT_TIMEOUT = 30
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SNDBUFSZ = 16384
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDENT = 10
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDLE = 600
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLINGER = 180
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLOGIN = 300
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTNOXFER = 300
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTSTALLED = 3600
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_XFER_BUFFER_SIZE = 16384
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_XFER_SCOREBOARD_UPDATES = 10
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and running proftd -V on 2_3_2-IB-2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Features:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     + Autoshadow support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     - Controls support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     + curses support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     - Developer support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     - DSO support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     - IPv6 support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     + Largefile support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     + ncurses support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     - POSIX ACL support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     + Shadow file support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     + Sendfile support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Tunable Options:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_BUFFER_SIZE = 1024
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_GLOBBING_MAX = 8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_HASH_TABLE_SIZE = 40
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_NEW_POOL_SIZE = 512
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_RCVBUFSZ = 8192
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_BUFFER_SIZE = 80
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_SCRUB_TIMER = 30
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SELECT_TIMEOUT = 30
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SNDBUFSZ = 8192
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDENT = 10
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDLE = 600
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLINGER = 180
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLOGIN = 300
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTNOXFER = 300
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTSTALLED = 3600
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_XFER_BUFFER_SIZE = 1024
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_XFER_SCOREBOARD_UPDATES = 10
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Further more the tinky proftpd has support (modules) for dyndns,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> shaper and ctrls (see proftpd -vv) which the 2_3_2-IB-2 has not.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll change the RCVBUFSZ to the size of SNDBUFSZ and we
>>>>>>>>>>>>> should discuss which modules are really needed for the ftp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>> flip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aurel schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you send us your proftpd.conf file !
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Indeed with mine, transfers are limited to 1.5M/s !
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Selon Julius Loman <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 01:37:46PM +0200, Julius Loman
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:13:05PM +0200, Aurel
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <massman@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you give us the FTP speed levels as well for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> information?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ftp is ok (but was not working out-of-box, beacuse of unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>> directive
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in configuration file)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> measured on 100MB file with wget: 6.92M/s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>>> further testing gives me slightly better speeds when i
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mount the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>> share
>>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on my linux laptop with cifs instead of smbfs (about 2.9 MB/s)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> when accessing from windows, it is the same as with smbfs
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (1.7MB/s)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> could you guys post your smb.conf you have on your nas ? i
>>>>>>>>>>>>> haven't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> touched mine yet, but i want a comparision - just to be sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Selon Julius Loman <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everybody
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm using tinky-2_3_2-mu-02.2 and I've got quite poor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>> throughtput
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>>>> via
>>>>>>>>>>>>> SMB, only about 1.4MB/sec upload to NAS and about 1.9MB/sec
>>>>>>>>>>>>> download.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> When doing download/upload operations - top shows me
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that smbd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>>>> eating
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~95% cpu and i receive many software interrups (si value
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in top
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~34%).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have such poor throughtput as well or do I have some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>> shitty
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>>>> piece of hardware ? (Maybe slower CPU than you ?) I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>> lot
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>>>> more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI - dma is turned on and I didn't measure performance
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> original
>>>>>>>>>>>>> firmware, because I've overwritten it with tinky in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>> hour
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>>> box arrived.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is my cpuinfo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Processor       : FA52Xid(wb) rev 1 (v4l)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BogoMIPS        : 69.83
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Features        : swp half thumb
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU implementer : 0x66
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU architecture: 4
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU variant     : 0x0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU part        : 0x526
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU revision    : 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cache type      : write-back
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cache clean     : cp15 c7 ops
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cache lockdown  : format B
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cache format    : Harvard
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I size          : 8192
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I assoc         : 2
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I line length   : 16
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I sets          : 256
>>>>>>>>>>>>> D size          : 4096
>>>>>>>>>>>>> D assoc         : 2
>>>>>>>>>>>>> D line length   : 16
>>>>>>>>>>>>> D sets          : 128
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hardware        : Sword sl2312
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Revision        : 0000
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Serial          : 0000000000000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ Julius Loman ][ lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx ][
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lomo.kyberia.net ][
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>>> icq:35732873
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aurel le bel homme
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ Julius Loman ][ lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx ][
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lomo.kyberia.net ][
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>>> icq:35732873 ]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ Julius Loman ][ lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx ][
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lomo.kyberia.net ][
>>>>>>>>>>>>> icq:35732873
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aurel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> Aurel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Aurel
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>   
>>>
> 
> 
> 

Other related posts: