[nas-2000] Re: Poor performance ?

  • From: Tom Haukap <warz@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <nas-2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 22:03:24 +0200

I don't want to disapoint anynone and remember that I have another box but I
get around 7 MB/s out of the box (nice phrase):

local: outlook.pst remote: outlook.pst
229 Entering Extended Passive Mode (|||1048|)
150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for outlook.pst (114409472 bytes)
100% 
|***************************************************************************
********|   109 MB    7.30 MB/s    00:14
226 Transfer complete.
114409472 bytes received in 00:14 (7.30 MB/s)
ftp> 


Am 15.05.2007 21:41 Uhr schrieb "philipp Wehrheim" unter <flipstar@xxxxxxx>:

> ok can please somebody try this:
> 
> stop the ftp-server
> 
> /usr/hddapp/etc/rc.d/S91proftpd stop
> 
> delete this
> rm -rf /var/run/proftpd/
> 
> and restart
> /usr/hddapp/etc/rc.d/S91proftpd start
> 
> is it now faster for you?
> 
> I get ~4,5 MB/s
> 
> Aurelien schrieb:
>> Nothing to do with the log detail level that you set in your
>> proftpd.conf file?
>> 
>> philipp Wehrheim a écrit :
>>> Hi again,
>>> 
>>> I found the main differense even though I don't know
>>> how to fix it
>>> 
>>> proftpd on tinky when running with -d 10 -n
>>> 
>>> does lots of
>>> icybox.local (192.168.10.10[192.168.10.10]) - FS: using system write()
>>> 
>>> which the orig fw doesn't ...
>>> guess thats the problem
>>> 
>>> anybody got a clue?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Aurel schrieb:
>>>  
>>>> Is it also possible to get old proftpd libs (I know that some
>>>> librairies have
>>>> been overwritten with latest proftpd version)?
>>>> Indeed, I would like to test the full "old proftpd package" on tinky
>>>> box.
>>>> 
>>>> (By the way, can you the list of new list that are used with the
>>>> tinky firmware?
>>>> If the porblem is not coming from the binaries, it can come from new
>>>> libs...)
>>>> 
>>>> Regards !
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Selon "flipstar@xxxxxxx" <flipstar@xxxxxxx>:
>>>> 
>>>>    
>>>>> here it is ..
>>>>> 
>>>>> Aurel schrieb:
>>>>>      
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Does someone has the original proftpd binary file ?
>>>>>> I would like to try on my tinky box to see my performances.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Selon philipp Wehrheim <flipstar@xxxxxxx>:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>        
>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> by the way today i visited the kiss webpage the kiss 1600 looks cool
>>>>>>> but my question is what exectly can you do with the kissdx
>>>>>>> and dos the kiss support upnp(av)?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>> flip
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Julius Loman schrieb:
>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 09:32:32PM +0200, philipp Wehrheim
>>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>> <flipstar@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>>> there are now 2 new ipk's lsof and strace ...
>>>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>> could you add the kissdx and relevant packages to your web please
>>>>>>>> ? just
>>>>>>>> if somebody is interested.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> i've sent you an email two days ago with the link -
>>>>>>>> http://lomo.kyberia.net/nas2000/.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> regards
>>>>>>>> julius
>>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>>> philipp Wehrheim schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> today I did some stacing and compared tinky's and raidsonic's
>>>>>>>>>> proftp
>>>>>>>>>> work.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> when running proftp (the same binary) on tinky it looks like this.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> ................
>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
>>>>>>>>>> alarm(219)                              = 0
>>>>>>>>>> write(11,
>>>>>>>>>> "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
>>>>>>>>>> 8192) = 8192
>>>>>>>>>> gettimeofday({67811881, 150000}, NULL)  = 0
>>>>>>>>>> select(14, [13], [], NULL, {1, 0})      = 1 (in [13], left {1, 0})
>>>>>>>>>> read(13,
>>>>>>>>>> "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
>>>>>>>>>> 8192) = 8192
>>>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 219
>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
>>>>>>>>>> alarm(219)                              = 0
>>>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 219
>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
>>>>>>>>>> alarm(219)                              = 0
>>>>>>>>>> write(11,
>>>>>>>>>> "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
>>>>>>>>>> 8192) = 8192
>>>>>>>>>> gettimeofday({67811881, 510000}, NULL)  = 0
>>>>>>>>>> select(14, [13], [], NULL, {1, 0})      = 1 (in [13], left {1, 0})
>>>>>>>>>> read(13,
>>>>>>>>>> "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
>>>>>>>>>> 8192) = 8192
>>>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 219
>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
>>>>>>>>>> alarm(219)                              = 0
>>>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 219
>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
>>>>>>>>>> .............
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> and on the raidsonic fw like this
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> ...............
>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101373
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> alarm(72)                               = 0
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 72
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101373
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101373
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> alarm(72)                               = 0
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> sendfile64(9, 11, [193131480], 4294967295) = 65536
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 72
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101373
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101373
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> alarm(72)                               = 0
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 72
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101373
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101374
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> alarm(72)                               = 0
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> sendfile64(9, 11, [193164248], 4294967295) = 65536
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 72
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101374
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101374
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> alarm(72)                               = 0
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 72
>>>>>>>>>> .................
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> to me it looks like the reads and write proftpd is doing when
>>>>>>>>>> executed
>>>>>>>>>> on tinky eats up lots of time ....
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Im not sure here it comes from ...
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Anybody having an idea?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Aurelien schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>>>> Good Mornin' everybody !
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Here are mine. they are very poor and i'm still investigating
>>>>>>>>>>> to find
>>>>>>>>>>> some answers....
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Firmware:  tinky-2_3_2-mu-02.2.tgz
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>        
>>>>> <http://www.nas-2000.org/download/tinky-2_3_2_mu_02/tinky-2_3_2-mu-02.2.tg
>>>>> z>
>>>>> 
>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>> FTP:
>>>>>>>>>>>    Up: 1.5MB/S
>>>>>>>>>>>    Down: 1.8MB/S (==> 2.3MB/S with initial proftpd.conf file)
>>>>>>>>>>> SMB:
>>>>>>>>>>>    Up: 1.5MB/S
>>>>>>>>>>>    Down: 1.8MB/S
>>>>>>>>>>> File System:
>>>>>>>>>>>    Ext3 (400GB)
>>>>>>>>>>> Drive test results:
>>>>>>>>>>>    root@NASDRIVE:~ # hdparm -tT /dev/hda1
>>>>>>>>>>>    /dev/hda1:
>>>>>>>>>>>     Timing buffer-cache reads:   124 MB in  2.04 seconds =  60.78
>>>>>>>>>>>        
>>>>> MB/sec
>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>>     Timing buffered disk reads:   26 MB in  3.00 seconds =   8.67
>>>>>>>>>>>        
>>>>> MB/sec
>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>> Computer OS:
>>>>>>>>>>>    XP, same results with ubuntu live cd
>>>>>>>>>>> Network:
>>>>>>>>>>>    NASBOX / LINKSYS WRT54G / ETHERNET
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>   philipp Wehrheim a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>        
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> here is my proftpd bechmark:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I used a 200M file created with
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> dd if=/dev/zero of=./200M_file bs=1M count=200
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> When I did these test samba, nfs and well yes proftd where
>>>>>>>>>>>> running.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> for tinky-2.3.2-mu-02.2 I get this results:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> upload
>>>>>>>>>>>> time ncftpput -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.100 . ./200M_file
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./200M_file:                         200.00 MB    2.83 MB/s
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> real    1m11.035s
>>>>>>>>>>>> user    0m0.056s
>>>>>>>>>>>> sys     0m1.140s
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> download
>>>>>>>>>>>> time ncftpget -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.100 . ./200M_file
>>>>>>>>>>>> 200M_file:                           200.00 MB    5.83 MB/s
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> real    0m34.539s
>>>>>>>>>>>> user    0m0.400s
>>>>>>>>>>>> sys     0m4.956s
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> for raidsonic fw 2_3_2-IB-2
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> upload
>>>>>>>>>>>> time ncftpput -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.99 . ./200M_file
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./200M_file:                         200.00 MB    5.65 MB/s
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> real    0m35.999s
>>>>>>>>>>>> user    0m0.072s
>>>>>>>>>>>> sys     0m0.984s
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> download
>>>>>>>>>>>> time ncftpget -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.99 . ./200M_file
>>>>>>>>>>>> 200M_file:                           200.00 MB    4.23 MB/s
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> real    0m47.516s
>>>>>>>>>>>> user    0m0.456s
>>>>>>>>>>>> sys     0m4.844s
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> So I think Tinky is doing quite well when it comes to download
>>>>>>>>>>>> but is very slow with uploads.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Running proftd -V on the tinky fw
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Features:
>>>>>>>>>>>>     + Autoshadow support
>>>>>>>>>>>>     + Controls support
>>>>>>>>>>>>     + curses support
>>>>>>>>>>>>     - Developer support
>>>>>>>>>>>>     - DSO support
>>>>>>>>>>>>     - IPv6 support
>>>>>>>>>>>>     + Largefile support
>>>>>>>>>>>>     + ncurses support
>>>>>>>>>>>>     - POSIX ACL support
>>>>>>>>>>>>     + Shadow file support
>>>>>>>>>>>>     + Sendfile support
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Tunable Options:
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_BUFFER_SIZE = 1024
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_GLOBBING_MAX = 8
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_HASH_TABLE_SIZE = 40
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_NEW_POOL_SIZE = 512
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_RCVBUFSZ = 87380
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_BUFFER_SIZE = 80
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_SCRUB_TIMER = 30
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SELECT_TIMEOUT = 30
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SNDBUFSZ = 16384
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDENT = 10
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDLE = 600
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLINGER = 180
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLOGIN = 300
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTNOXFER = 300
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTSTALLED = 3600
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_XFER_BUFFER_SIZE = 16384
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_XFER_SCOREBOARD_UPDATES = 10
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> and running proftd -V on 2_3_2-IB-2
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Features:
>>>>>>>>>>>>     + Autoshadow support
>>>>>>>>>>>>     - Controls support
>>>>>>>>>>>>     + curses support
>>>>>>>>>>>>     - Developer support
>>>>>>>>>>>>     - DSO support
>>>>>>>>>>>>     - IPv6 support
>>>>>>>>>>>>     + Largefile support
>>>>>>>>>>>>     + ncurses support
>>>>>>>>>>>>     - POSIX ACL support
>>>>>>>>>>>>     + Shadow file support
>>>>>>>>>>>>     + Sendfile support
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Tunable Options:
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_BUFFER_SIZE = 1024
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_GLOBBING_MAX = 8
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_HASH_TABLE_SIZE = 40
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_NEW_POOL_SIZE = 512
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_RCVBUFSZ = 8192
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_BUFFER_SIZE = 80
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_SCRUB_TIMER = 30
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SELECT_TIMEOUT = 30
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SNDBUFSZ = 8192
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDENT = 10
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDLE = 600
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLINGER = 180
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLOGIN = 300
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTNOXFER = 300
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTSTALLED = 3600
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_XFER_BUFFER_SIZE = 1024
>>>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_XFER_SCOREBOARD_UPDATES = 10
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Further more the tinky proftpd has support (modules) for dyndns,
>>>>>>>>>>>> shaper and ctrls (see proftpd -vv) which the 2_3_2-IB-2 has not.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll change the RCVBUFSZ to the size of SNDBUFSZ and we
>>>>>>>>>>>> should discuss which modules are really needed for the ftp.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>> regards
>>>>>>>>>>>> flip
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Aurel schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you send us your proftpd.conf file !
>>>>>>>>>>>> Indeed with mine, transfers are limited to 1.5M/s !
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Selon Julius Loman <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 01:37:46PM +0200, Julius Loman
>>>>>>>>>>>> <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:13:05PM +0200, Aurel
>>>>>>>>>>>> <massman@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you give us the FTP speed levels as well for
>>>>>>>>>>>> information?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>> ftp is ok (but was not working out-of-box, beacuse of unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>> directive
>>>>>>>>>>>> in configuration file)
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> measured on 100MB file with wget: 6.92M/s
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>> further testing gives me slightly better speeds when i
>>>>>>>>>>>> mount the
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>> share
>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>>>>>> on my linux laptop with cifs instead of smbfs (about 2.9 MB/s)
>>>>>>>>>>>> when accessing from windows, it is the same as with smbfs
>>>>>>>>>>>> (1.7MB/s)
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> could you guys post your smb.conf you have on your nas ? i
>>>>>>>>>>>> haven't
>>>>>>>>>>>> touched mine yet, but i want a comparision - just to be sure
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>> Selon Julius Loman <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everybody
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm using tinky-2_3_2-mu-02.2 and I've got quite poor
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>> throughtput
>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>>> via
>>>>>>>>>>>> SMB, only about 1.4MB/sec upload to NAS and about 1.9MB/sec
>>>>>>>>>>>> download.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> When doing download/upload operations - top shows me
>>>>>>>>>>>> that smbd
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>> is
>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>>> eating
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>> ~95% cpu and i receive many software interrups (si value
>>>>>>>>>>>> in top
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>> is
>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>>> ~34%).
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have such poor throughtput as well or do I have some
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>> shitty
>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>>> piece of hardware ? (Maybe slower CPU than you ?) I
>>>>>>>>>>>> expected a
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>> lot
>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>>> more.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI - dma is turned on and I didn't measure performance
>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>> original
>>>>>>>>>>>> firmware, because I've overwritten it with tinky in the
>>>>>>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>> hour
>>>>>      
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>> box arrived.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is my cpuinfo:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Processor       : FA52Xid(wb) rev 1 (v4l)
>>>>>>>>>>>> BogoMIPS        : 69.83
>>>>>>>>>>>> Features        : swp half thumb
>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU implementer : 0x66
>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU architecture: 4
>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU variant     : 0x0
>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU part        : 0x526
>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU revision    : 1
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cache type      : write-back
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cache clean     : cp15 c7 ops
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cache lockdown  : format B
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cache format    : Harvard
>>>>>>>>>>>> I size          : 8192
>>>>>>>>>>>> I assoc         : 2
>>>>>>>>>>>> I line length   : 16
>>>>>>>>>>>> I sets          : 256
>>>>>>>>>>>> D size          : 4096
>>>>>>>>>>>> D assoc         : 2
>>>>>>>>>>>> D line length   : 16
>>>>>>>>>>>> D sets          : 128
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hardware        : Sword sl2312
>>>>>>>>>>>> Revision        : 0000
>>>>>>>>>>>> Serial          : 0000000000000000
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ Julius Loman ][ lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx ][
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lomo.kyberia.net ][
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>> icq:35732873
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>> ]
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Aurel le bel homme
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ Julius Loman ][ lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx ][
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lomo.kyberia.net ][
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>> icq:35732873 ]
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ Julius Loman ][ lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx ][
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lomo.kyberia.net ][
>>>>>>>>>>>> icq:35732873
>>>>>>>>>>>> ]
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Aurel
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Aurel
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>         
>>>> -- 
>>>> Aurel
>>>> 
>>>>     
>>> 
>>>   
>> 
>> 



Other related posts: