No changes for me :'( philipp Wehrheim a écrit :
ok can please somebody try this: stop the ftp-server /usr/hddapp/etc/rc.d/S91proftpd stop delete this rm -rf /var/run/proftpd/ and restart /usr/hddapp/etc/rc.d/S91proftpd start is it now faster for you? I get ~4,5 MB/s Aurelien schrieb:Nothing to do with the log detail level that you set in your proftpd.conf file? philipp Wehrheim a écrit :Hi again, I found the main differense even though I don't know how to fix it proftpd on tinky when running with -d 10 -n does lots of icybox.local (192.168.10.10[192.168.10.10]) - FS: using system write() which the orig fw doesn't ... guess thats the problem anybody got a clue? Aurel schrieb:Is it also possible to get old proftpd libs (I know that some librairies have been overwritten with latest proftpd version)? Indeed, I would like to test the full "old proftpd package" on tinky box. (By the way, can you the list of new list that are used with the tinky firmware? If the porblem is not coming from the binaries, it can come from new libs...) Regards ! Selon "flipstar@xxxxxxx" <flipstar@xxxxxxx>:here it is .. Aurel schrieb:Hi, Does someone has the original proftpd binary file ? I would like to try on my tinky box to see my performances. Selon philipp Wehrheim <flipstar@xxxxxxx>:sure by the way today i visited the kiss webpage the kiss 1600 looks cool but my question is what exectly can you do with the kissdx and dos the kiss support upnp(av)? thanks flip Julius Loman schrieb:On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 09:32:32PM +0200, philipp Wehrheim<flipstar@xxxxxxx> wrote:there are now 2 new ipk's lsof and strace ...could you add the kissdx and relevant packages to your web please ? just if somebody is interested. i've sent you an email two days ago with the link - http://lomo.kyberia.net/nas2000/. regards juliusphilipp Wehrheim schrieb:Hi, today I did some stacing and compared tinky's and raidsonic's proftp work. when running proftp (the same binary) on tinky it looks like this. ................ time(NULL) = 67811881 alarm(219) = 0 write(11, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 8192) = 8192 gettimeofday({67811881, 150000}, NULL) = 0 select(14, [13], [], NULL, {1, 0}) = 1 (in [13], left {1, 0}) read(13, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 8192) = 8192 alarm(0) = 219 time(NULL) = 67811881 time(NULL) = 67811881 alarm(219) = 0 alarm(0) = 219 time(NULL) = 67811881 time(NULL) = 67811881 alarm(219) = 0 write(11, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 8192) = 8192 gettimeofday({67811881, 510000}, NULL) = 0 select(14, [13], [], NULL, {1, 0}) = 1 (in [13], left {1, 0}) read(13, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 8192) = 8192 alarm(0) = 219 time(NULL) = 67811881 time(NULL) = 67811881 alarm(219) = 0 alarm(0) = 219 time(NULL) = 67811881 time(NULL) = 67811881 ............. and on the raidsonic fw like this ............... time(NULL) = 101373 alarm(72) = 0 alarm(0) = 72 time(NULL) = 101373 time(NULL) = 101373 alarm(72) = 0 sendfile64(9, 11, [193131480], 4294967295) = 65536 alarm(0) = 72 time(NULL) = 101373 time(NULL) = 101373 alarm(72) = 0 alarm(0) = 72 time(NULL) = 101373 time(NULL) = 101374 alarm(72) = 0 sendfile64(9, 11, [193164248], 4294967295) = 65536 alarm(0) = 72 time(NULL) = 101374 time(NULL) = 101374 alarm(72) = 0 alarm(0) = 72 ................. to me it looks like the reads and write proftpd is doing when executed on tinky eats up lots of time .... Im not sure here it comes from ... Anybody having an idea? Aurelien schrieb:Good Mornin' everybody ! Here are mine. they are very poor and i'm still investigating to find some answers.... Firmware: tinky-2_3_2-mu-02.2.tgz<http://www.nas-2000.org/download/tinky-2_3_2_mu_02/tinky-2_3_2-mu-02.2.tgz>FTP: Up: 1.5MB/S Down: 1.8MB/S (==> 2.3MB/S with initial proftpd.conf file) SMB: Up: 1.5MB/S Down: 1.8MB/S File System: Ext3 (400GB) Drive test results: root@NASDRIVE:~ # hdparm -tT /dev/hda1 /dev/hda1: Timing buffer-cache reads: 124 MB in 2.04 seconds = 60.78MB/secTiming buffered disk reads: 26 MB in 3.00 seconds = 8.67MB/secComputer OS: XP, same results with ubuntu live cd Network: NASBOX / LINKSYS WRT54G / ETHERNET philipp Wehrheim a écrit :Hi everybody, here is my proftpd bechmark: I used a 200M file created with dd if=/dev/zero of=./200M_file bs=1M count=200 When I did these test samba, nfs and well yes proftd where running. for tinky-2.3.2-mu-02.2 I get this results: upload time ncftpput -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.100 . ./200M_file ./200M_file: 200.00 MB 2.83 MB/s real 1m11.035s user 0m0.056s sys 0m1.140s download time ncftpget -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.100 . ./200M_file 200M_file: 200.00 MB 5.83 MB/s real 0m34.539s user 0m0.400s sys 0m4.956s for raidsonic fw 2_3_2-IB-2 upload time ncftpput -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.99 . ./200M_file ./200M_file: 200.00 MB 5.65 MB/s real 0m35.999s user 0m0.072s sys 0m0.984s download time ncftpget -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.99 . ./200M_file 200M_file: 200.00 MB 4.23 MB/s real 0m47.516s user 0m0.456s sys 0m4.844s So I think Tinky is doing quite well when it comes to download but is very slow with uploads. Running proftd -V on the tinky fw Features: + Autoshadow support + Controls support + curses support - Developer support - DSO support - IPv6 support + Largefile support + ncurses support - POSIX ACL support + Shadow file support + Sendfile support Tunable Options: PR_TUNABLE_BUFFER_SIZE = 1024 PR_TUNABLE_GLOBBING_MAX = 8 PR_TUNABLE_HASH_TABLE_SIZE = 40 PR_TUNABLE_NEW_POOL_SIZE = 512 PR_TUNABLE_RCVBUFSZ = 87380 PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_BUFFER_SIZE = 80 PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_SCRUB_TIMER = 30 PR_TUNABLE_SELECT_TIMEOUT = 30 PR_TUNABLE_SNDBUFSZ = 16384 PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDENT = 10 PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDLE = 600 PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLINGER = 180 PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLOGIN = 300 PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTNOXFER = 300 PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTSTALLED = 3600 PR_TUNABLE_XFER_BUFFER_SIZE = 16384 PR_TUNABLE_XFER_SCOREBOARD_UPDATES = 10 and running proftd -V on 2_3_2-IB-2 Features: + Autoshadow support - Controls support + curses support - Developer support - DSO support - IPv6 support + Largefile support + ncurses support - POSIX ACL support + Shadow file support + Sendfile support Tunable Options: PR_TUNABLE_BUFFER_SIZE = 1024 PR_TUNABLE_GLOBBING_MAX = 8 PR_TUNABLE_HASH_TABLE_SIZE = 40 PR_TUNABLE_NEW_POOL_SIZE = 512 PR_TUNABLE_RCVBUFSZ = 8192 PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_BUFFER_SIZE = 80 PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_SCRUB_TIMER = 30 PR_TUNABLE_SELECT_TIMEOUT = 30 PR_TUNABLE_SNDBUFSZ = 8192 PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDENT = 10 PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDLE = 600 PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLINGER = 180 PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLOGIN = 300 PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTNOXFER = 300 PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTSTALLED = 3600 PR_TUNABLE_XFER_BUFFER_SIZE = 1024 PR_TUNABLE_XFER_SCOREBOARD_UPDATES = 10 Further more the tinky proftpd has support (modules) for dyndns, shaper and ctrls (see proftpd -vv) which the 2_3_2-IB-2 has not. I'll change the RCVBUFSZ to the size of SNDBUFSZ and we should discuss which modules are really needed for the ftp. -- regards flip Aurel schrieb:Can you send us your proftpd.conf file ! Indeed with mine, transfers are limited to 1.5M/s ! Selon Julius Loman <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>:On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 01:37:46PM +0200, Julius Loman <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:13:05PM +0200, Aurel <massman@xxxxxxx> wrote:Can you give us the FTP speed levels as well for information?ftp is ok (but was not working out-of-box, beacuse of unknown directive in configuration file) measured on 100MB file with wget: 6.92M/sfurther testing gives me slightly better speeds when i mount theshareon my linux laptop with cifs instead of smbfs (about 2.9 MB/s) when accessing from windows, it is the same as with smbfs (1.7MB/s) could you guys post your smb.conf you have on your nas ? i haven't touched mine yet, but i want a comparision - just to be sureSelon Julius Loman <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>:Hi everybody I'm using tinky-2_3_2-mu-02.2 and I've got quite poorthroughtputvia SMB, only about 1.4MB/sec upload to NAS and about 1.9MB/sec download. When doing download/upload operations - top shows me that smbdiseating~95% cpu and i receive many software interrups (si value in topis~34%). Do you have such poor throughtput as well or do I have someshittypiece of hardware ? (Maybe slower CPU than you ?) I expected alotmore.FYI - dma is turned on and I didn't measure performance with original firmware, because I've overwritten it with tinky in the samehourasthebox arrived. Here is my cpuinfo: Processor : FA52Xid(wb) rev 1 (v4l) BogoMIPS : 69.83 Features : swp half thumb CPU implementer : 0x66 CPU architecture: 4 CPU variant : 0x0 CPU part : 0x526 CPU revision : 1 Cache type : write-back Cache clean : cp15 c7 ops Cache lockdown : format B Cache format : Harvard I size : 8192 I assoc : 2 I line length : 16 I sets : 256 D size : 4096 D assoc : 2 D line length : 16 D sets : 128 Hardware : Sword sl2312 Revision : 0000 Serial : 0000000000000000 -- [ Julius Loman ][ lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx ][ http://lomo.kyberia.net ][icq:35732873]-- Aurel le bel homme-- [ Julius Loman ][ lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx ][ http://lomo.kyberia.net ][icq:35732873 ] -- [ Julius Loman ][ lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx ][ http://lomo.kyberia.net ][ icq:35732873 ]-- Aurel-- Aurel-- Aurel
