[nas-2000] Re: Poor performance ?

  • From: Julius Loman <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nas-2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 21:58:48 +0200

hi flip

before deleting
PC->NAS 3.2MB/s
NAS->PC 6.6MB/s

after deleting
PC->NAS 3.3MB/s
NAS->PC 6.6MB/s

i guess it is the same result, but i think i've had worse results
before.. maybe because my clock on nas wasn't set at all.

julius

On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 09:41:35PM +0200, philipp Wehrheim <flipstar@xxxxxxx> 
wrote:
> ok can please somebody try this:
> 
> stop the ftp-server
> 
> /usr/hddapp/etc/rc.d/S91proftpd stop
> 
> delete this
> rm -rf /var/run/proftpd/
> 
> and restart
> /usr/hddapp/etc/rc.d/S91proftpd start
> 
> is it now faster for you?
> 
> I get ~4,5 MB/s
> 
> Aurelien schrieb:
> > Nothing to do with the log detail level that you set in your
> > proftpd.conf file?
> > 
> > philipp Wehrheim a écrit :
> >> Hi again,
> >>
> >> I found the main differense even though I don't know
> >> how to fix it
> >>
> >> proftpd on tinky when running with -d 10 -n
> >>
> >> does lots of
> >> icybox.local (192.168.10.10[192.168.10.10]) - FS: using system write()
> >>
> >> which the orig fw doesn't ...
> >> guess thats the problem
> >>
> >> anybody got a clue?
> >>
> >>
> >> Aurel schrieb:
> >>  
> >>> Is it also possible to get old proftpd libs (I know that some
> >>> librairies have
> >>> been overwritten with latest proftpd version)?
> >>> Indeed, I would like to test the full "old proftpd package" on tinky
> >>> box.
> >>>
> >>> (By the way, can you the list of new list that are used with the
> >>> tinky firmware?
> >>> If the porblem is not coming from the binaries, it can come from new
> >>> libs...)
> >>>
> >>> Regards !
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Selon "flipstar@xxxxxxx" <flipstar@xxxxxxx>:
> >>>
> >>>    
> >>>> here it is ..
> >>>>
> >>>> Aurel schrieb:
> >>>>      
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Does someone has the original proftpd binary file ?
> >>>>> I would like to try on my tinky box to see my performances.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Selon philipp Wehrheim <flipstar@xxxxxxx>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>        
> >>>>>> sure
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> by the way today i visited the kiss webpage the kiss 1600 looks cool
> >>>>>> but my question is what exectly can you do with the kissdx
> >>>>>> and dos the kiss support upnp(av)?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> thanks
> >>>>>> flip
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Julius Loman schrieb:
> >>>>>>          
> >>>>>>> On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 09:32:32PM +0200, philipp Wehrheim
> >>>>>>>             
> >>>>>> <flipstar@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>          
> >>>>>>>> there are now 2 new ipk's lsof and strace ...
> >>>>>>>>               
> >>>>>>> could you add the kissdx and relevant packages to your web please
> >>>>>>> ? just
> >>>>>>> if somebody is interested.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> i've sent you an email two days ago with the link -
> >>>>>>> http://lomo.kyberia.net/nas2000/.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> regards
> >>>>>>> julius
> >>>>>>>            
> >>>>>>>> philipp Wehrheim schrieb:
> >>>>>>>>              
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> today I did some stacing and compared tinky's and raidsonic's
> >>>>>>>>> proftp
> >>>>>>>>> work.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> when running proftp (the same binary) on tinky it looks like this.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ................
> >>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
> >>>>>>>>> alarm(219)                              = 0
> >>>>>>>>> write(11,
> >>>>>>>>> "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
> >>>>>>>>> 8192) = 8192
> >>>>>>>>> gettimeofday({67811881, 150000}, NULL)  = 0
> >>>>>>>>> select(14, [13], [], NULL, {1, 0})      = 1 (in [13], left {1, 0})
> >>>>>>>>> read(13,
> >>>>>>>>> "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
> >>>>>>>>> 8192) = 8192
> >>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 219
> >>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
> >>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
> >>>>>>>>> alarm(219)                              = 0
> >>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 219
> >>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
> >>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
> >>>>>>>>> alarm(219)                              = 0
> >>>>>>>>> write(11,
> >>>>>>>>> "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
> >>>>>>>>> 8192) = 8192
> >>>>>>>>> gettimeofday({67811881, 510000}, NULL)  = 0
> >>>>>>>>> select(14, [13], [], NULL, {1, 0})      = 1 (in [13], left {1, 0})
> >>>>>>>>> read(13,
> >>>>>>>>> "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
> >>>>>>>>> 8192) = 8192
> >>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 219
> >>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
> >>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
> >>>>>>>>> alarm(219)                              = 0
> >>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 219
> >>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
> >>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 67811881
> >>>>>>>>> .............
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> and on the raidsonic fw like this
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ...............
> >>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101373
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> alarm(72)                               = 0
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 72
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101373
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101373
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> alarm(72)                               = 0
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> sendfile64(9, 11, [193131480], 4294967295) = 65536
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 72
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101373
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101373
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> alarm(72)                               = 0
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 72
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101373
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101374
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> alarm(72)                               = 0
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> sendfile64(9, 11, [193164248], 4294967295) = 65536
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 72
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101374
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> time(NULL)                              = 101374
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> alarm(72)                               = 0
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> alarm(0)                                = 72
> >>>>>>>>> .................
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> to me it looks like the reads and write proftpd is doing when
> >>>>>>>>> executed
> >>>>>>>>> on tinky eats up lots of time ....
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Im not sure here it comes from ...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Anybody having an idea?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Aurelien schrieb:
> >>>>>>>>>                
> >>>>>>>>>> Good Mornin' everybody !
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Here are mine. they are very poor and i'm still investigating
> >>>>>>>>>> to find
> >>>>>>>>>> some answers....
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Firmware:  tinky-2_3_2-mu-02.2.tgz
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>                   
> >>>> <http://www.nas-2000.org/download/tinky-2_3_2_mu_02/tinky-2_3_2-mu-02.2.tgz>
> >>>>
> >>>>      
> >>>>>>>>>> FTP:
> >>>>>>>>>>    Up: 1.5MB/S
> >>>>>>>>>>    Down: 1.8MB/S (==> 2.3MB/S with initial proftpd.conf file)
> >>>>>>>>>> SMB:
> >>>>>>>>>>    Up: 1.5MB/S
> >>>>>>>>>>    Down: 1.8MB/S
> >>>>>>>>>> File System:
> >>>>>>>>>>    Ext3 (400GB)
> >>>>>>>>>> Drive test results:
> >>>>>>>>>>    root@NASDRIVE:~ # hdparm -tT /dev/hda1
> >>>>>>>>>>    /dev/hda1:
> >>>>>>>>>>     Timing buffer-cache reads:   124 MB in  2.04 seconds =  60.78
> >>>>>>>>>>                   
> >>>> MB/sec
> >>>>      
> >>>>>>>>>>     Timing buffered disk reads:   26 MB in  3.00 seconds =   8.67
> >>>>>>>>>>                   
> >>>> MB/sec
> >>>>      
> >>>>>>>>>> Computer OS:
> >>>>>>>>>>    XP, same results with ubuntu live cd
> >>>>>>>>>> Network:
> >>>>>>>>>>    NASBOX / LINKSYS WRT54G / ETHERNET
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>   philipp Wehrheim a écrit :
> >>>>>>>>>>                  
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi everybody,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> here is my proftpd bechmark:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I used a 200M file created with
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> dd if=/dev/zero of=./200M_file bs=1M count=200
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> When I did these test samba, nfs and well yes proftd where
> >>>>>>>>>>> running.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> for tinky-2.3.2-mu-02.2 I get this results:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> upload
> >>>>>>>>>>> time ncftpput -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.100 . ./200M_file
> >>>>>>>>>>> ./200M_file:                         200.00 MB    2.83 MB/s
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> real    1m11.035s
> >>>>>>>>>>> user    0m0.056s
> >>>>>>>>>>> sys     0m1.140s
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> download
> >>>>>>>>>>> time ncftpget -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.100 . ./200M_file
> >>>>>>>>>>> 200M_file:                           200.00 MB    5.83 MB/s
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> real    0m34.539s
> >>>>>>>>>>> user    0m0.400s
> >>>>>>>>>>> sys     0m4.956s
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> for raidsonic fw 2_3_2-IB-2
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> upload
> >>>>>>>>>>> time ncftpput -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.99 . ./200M_file
> >>>>>>>>>>> ./200M_file:                         200.00 MB    5.65 MB/s
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> real    0m35.999s
> >>>>>>>>>>> user    0m0.072s
> >>>>>>>>>>> sys     0m0.984s
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> download
> >>>>>>>>>>> time ncftpget -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.99 . ./200M_file
> >>>>>>>>>>> 200M_file:                           200.00 MB    4.23 MB/s
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> real    0m47.516s
> >>>>>>>>>>> user    0m0.456s
> >>>>>>>>>>> sys     0m4.844s
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> So I think Tinky is doing quite well when it comes to download
> >>>>>>>>>>> but is very slow with uploads.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Running proftd -V on the tinky fw
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Features:
> >>>>>>>>>>>     + Autoshadow support
> >>>>>>>>>>>     + Controls support
> >>>>>>>>>>>     + curses support
> >>>>>>>>>>>     - Developer support
> >>>>>>>>>>>     - DSO support
> >>>>>>>>>>>     - IPv6 support
> >>>>>>>>>>>     + Largefile support
> >>>>>>>>>>>     + ncurses support
> >>>>>>>>>>>     - POSIX ACL support
> >>>>>>>>>>>     + Shadow file support
> >>>>>>>>>>>     + Sendfile support
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>   Tunable Options:
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_BUFFER_SIZE = 1024
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_GLOBBING_MAX = 8
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_HASH_TABLE_SIZE = 40
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_NEW_POOL_SIZE = 512
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_RCVBUFSZ = 87380
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_BUFFER_SIZE = 80
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_SCRUB_TIMER = 30
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SELECT_TIMEOUT = 30
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SNDBUFSZ = 16384
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDENT = 10
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDLE = 600
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLINGER = 180
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLOGIN = 300
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTNOXFER = 300
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTSTALLED = 3600
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_XFER_BUFFER_SIZE = 16384
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_XFER_SCOREBOARD_UPDATES = 10
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> and running proftd -V on 2_3_2-IB-2
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>   Features:
> >>>>>>>>>>>     + Autoshadow support
> >>>>>>>>>>>     - Controls support
> >>>>>>>>>>>     + curses support
> >>>>>>>>>>>     - Developer support
> >>>>>>>>>>>     - DSO support
> >>>>>>>>>>>     - IPv6 support
> >>>>>>>>>>>     + Largefile support
> >>>>>>>>>>>     + ncurses support
> >>>>>>>>>>>     - POSIX ACL support
> >>>>>>>>>>>     + Shadow file support
> >>>>>>>>>>>     + Sendfile support
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>   Tunable Options:
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_BUFFER_SIZE = 1024
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_GLOBBING_MAX = 8
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_HASH_TABLE_SIZE = 40
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_NEW_POOL_SIZE = 512
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_RCVBUFSZ = 8192
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_BUFFER_SIZE = 80
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_SCRUB_TIMER = 30
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SELECT_TIMEOUT = 30
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_SNDBUFSZ = 8192
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDENT = 10
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDLE = 600
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLINGER = 180
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLOGIN = 300
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTNOXFER = 300
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTSTALLED = 3600
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_XFER_BUFFER_SIZE = 1024
> >>>>>>>>>>>     PR_TUNABLE_XFER_SCOREBOARD_UPDATES = 10
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Further more the tinky proftpd has support (modules) for dyndns,
> >>>>>>>>>>> shaper and ctrls (see proftpd -vv) which the 2_3_2-IB-2 has not.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I'll change the RCVBUFSZ to the size of SNDBUFSZ and we
> >>>>>>>>>>> should discuss which modules are really needed for the ftp.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> -- 
> >>>>>>>>>>> regards
> >>>>>>>>>>> flip
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Aurel schrieb:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>                    
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Can you send us your proftpd.conf file !
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Indeed with mine, transfers are limited to 1.5M/s !
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Selon Julius Loman <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>                      
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 01:37:46PM +0200, Julius Loman
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>                        
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:13:05PM +0200, Aurel
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <massman@xxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>                          
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you give us the FTP speed levels as well for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                             
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ftp is ok (but was not working out-of-box, beacuse of unknown
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> directive
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in configuration file)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> measured on 100MB file with wget: 6.92M/s
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>                           
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> further testing gives me slightly better speeds when i
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mount the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>                         
> >>>>>> share
> >>>>>>          
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> on my linux laptop with cifs instead of smbfs (about 2.9 MB/s)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> when accessing from windows, it is the same as with smbfs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (1.7MB/s)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> could you guys post your smb.conf you have on your nas ? i
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> haven't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> touched mine yet, but i want a comparision - just to be sure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>                        
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Selon Julius Loman <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                            
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everybody
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm using tinky-2_3_2-mu-02.2 and I've got quite poor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                               
> >>>> throughtput
> >>>>      
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> via
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SMB, only about 1.4MB/sec upload to NAS and about 1.9MB/sec
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> download.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When doing download/upload operations - top shows me
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that smbd
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                               
> >>>> is
> >>>>      
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> eating
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>                        
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~95% cpu and i receive many software interrups (si value
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in top
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                               
> >>>> is
> >>>>      
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~34%).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have such poor throughtput as well or do I have some
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                               
> >>>> shitty
> >>>>      
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piece of hardware ? (Maybe slower CPU than you ?) I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                               
> >>>> lot
> >>>>      
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> more.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>                        
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI - dma is turned on and I didn't measure performance
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> original
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> firmware, because I've overwritten it with tinky in the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                               
> >>>> hour
> >>>>      
> >>>>>> as
> >>>>>>          
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>                        
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> box arrived.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is my cpuinfo:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Processor       : FA52Xid(wb) rev 1 (v4l)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BogoMIPS        : 69.83
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Features        : swp half thumb
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU implementer : 0x66
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU architecture: 4
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU variant     : 0x0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU part        : 0x526
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU revision    : 1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cache type      : write-back
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cache clean     : cp15 c7 ops
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cache lockdown  : format B
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cache format    : Harvard
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I size          : 8192
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I assoc         : 2
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I line length   : 16
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I sets          : 256
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D size          : 4096
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D assoc         : 2
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D line length   : 16
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D sets          : 128
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hardware        : Sword sl2312
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Revision        : 0000
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Serial          : 0000000000000000
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ Julius Loman ][ lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx ][
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lomo.kyberia.net ][
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                               
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> icq:35732873
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>                        
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                               
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aurel le bel homme
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                             
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ Julius Loman ][ lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx ][
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lomo.kyberia.net ][
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>                           
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> icq:35732873 ]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ Julius Loman ][ lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx ][
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lomo.kyberia.net ][
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> icq:35732873
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>                         
> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Aurel
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>                       
> >>>>> -- 
> >>>>> Aurel
> >>>>>
> >>>>>         
> >>> -- 
> >>> Aurel
> >>>
> >>>     
> >>
> >>   
> > 
> > 
> 

-- 

[ Julius Loman ][ lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx ][ http://lomo.kyberia.net ][ icq:35732873 ]

Other related posts: