[nas-2000] Re: Poor performance ?
- From: Aurel <massman@xxxxxxx>
- To: nas-2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 19:07:11 +0200
Somthing to do with new libs?
Selon philipp Wehrheim <flipstar@xxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
>
>
> today I did some stacing and compared tinky's and raidsonic's proftp
> work.
>
> when running proftp (the same binary) on tinky it looks like this.
>
>
> ................
> time(NULL) = 67811881
> alarm(219) = 0
> write(11, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
> 8192) = 8192
> gettimeofday({67811881, 150000}, NULL) = 0
> select(14, [13], [], NULL, {1, 0}) = 1 (in [13], left {1, 0})
> read(13, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
> 8192) = 8192
> alarm(0) = 219
> time(NULL) = 67811881
> time(NULL) = 67811881
> alarm(219) = 0
> alarm(0) = 219
> time(NULL) = 67811881
> time(NULL) = 67811881
> alarm(219) = 0
> write(11, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
> 8192) = 8192
> gettimeofday({67811881, 510000}, NULL) = 0
> select(14, [13], [], NULL, {1, 0}) = 1 (in [13], left {1, 0})
> read(13, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
> 8192) = 8192
> alarm(0) = 219
> time(NULL) = 67811881
> time(NULL) = 67811881
> alarm(219) = 0
> alarm(0) = 219
> time(NULL) = 67811881
> time(NULL) = 67811881
> .............
>
>
> and on the raidsonic fw like this
>
>
> ...............
> time(NULL) = 101373
>
> alarm(72) = 0
>
> alarm(0) = 72
>
> time(NULL) = 101373
>
> time(NULL) = 101373
>
> alarm(72) = 0
>
> sendfile64(9, 11, [193131480], 4294967295) = 65536
>
> alarm(0) = 72
>
> time(NULL) = 101373
>
> time(NULL) = 101373
>
> alarm(72) = 0
>
> alarm(0) = 72
>
> time(NULL) = 101373
>
> time(NULL) = 101374
>
> alarm(72) = 0
>
> sendfile64(9, 11, [193164248], 4294967295) = 65536
>
> alarm(0) = 72
>
> time(NULL) = 101374
>
> time(NULL) = 101374
>
> alarm(72) = 0
>
> alarm(0) = 72
> .................
>
>
> to me it looks like the reads and write proftpd is doing when executed
> on tinky eats up lots of time ....
>
> Im not sure here it comes from ...
>
> Anybody having an idea?
>
>
>
> Aurelien schrieb:
> > Good Mornin' everybody !
> >
> > Here are mine. they are very poor and i'm still investigating to find
> > some answers....
> >
> > Firmware: tinky-2_3_2-mu-02.2.tgz
> >
> <http://www.nas-2000.org/download/tinky-2_3_2_mu_02/tinky-2_3_2-mu-02.2.tgz>
> >
> > FTP:
> > Up: 1.5MB/S
> > Down: 1.8MB/S (==> 2.3MB/S with initial proftpd.conf file)
> > SMB:
> > Up: 1.5MB/S
> > Down: 1.8MB/S
> > File System:
> > Ext3 (400GB)
> > Drive test results:
> > root@NASDRIVE:~ # hdparm -tT /dev/hda1
> > /dev/hda1:
> > Timing buffer-cache reads: 124 MB in 2.04 seconds = 60.78 MB/sec
> > Timing buffered disk reads: 26 MB in 3.00 seconds = 8.67 MB/sec
> > Computer OS:
> > XP, same results with ubuntu live cd
> > Network:
> > NASBOX / LINKSYS WRT54G / ETHERNET
> >
> >
> > philipp Wehrheim a écrit :
> >> Hi everybody,
> >>
> >> here is my proftpd bechmark:
> >>
> >> I used a 200M file created with
> >>
> >> dd if=/dev/zero of=./200M_file bs=1M count=200
> >>
> >> When I did these test samba, nfs and well yes proftd where running.
> >>
> >> for tinky-2.3.2-mu-02.2 I get this results:
> >>
> >> upload
> >> time ncftpput -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.100 . ./200M_file
> >> ./200M_file: 200.00 MB 2.83 MB/s
> >>
> >> real 1m11.035s
> >> user 0m0.056s
> >> sys 0m1.140s
> >>
> >>
> >> download
> >> time ncftpget -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.100 . ./200M_file
> >> 200M_file: 200.00 MB 5.83 MB/s
> >>
> >> real 0m34.539s
> >> user 0m0.400s
> >> sys 0m4.956s
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> for raidsonic fw 2_3_2-IB-2
> >>
> >> upload
> >> time ncftpput -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.99 . ./200M_file
> >> ./200M_file: 200.00 MB 5.65 MB/s
> >>
> >> real 0m35.999s
> >> user 0m0.072s
> >> sys 0m0.984s
> >>
> >>
> >> download
> >> time ncftpget -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.99 . ./200M_file
> >> 200M_file: 200.00 MB 4.23 MB/s
> >>
> >> real 0m47.516s
> >> user 0m0.456s
> >> sys 0m4.844s
> >>
> >>
> >> So I think Tinky is doing quite well when it comes to download
> >> but is very slow with uploads.
> >>
> >> Running proftd -V on the tinky fw
> >>
> >> Features:
> >> + Autoshadow support
> >> + Controls support
> >> + curses support
> >> - Developer support
> >> - DSO support
> >> - IPv6 support
> >> + Largefile support
> >> + ncurses support
> >> - POSIX ACL support
> >> + Shadow file support
> >> + Sendfile support
> >>
> >> Tunable Options:
> >> PR_TUNABLE_BUFFER_SIZE = 1024
> >> PR_TUNABLE_GLOBBING_MAX = 8
> >> PR_TUNABLE_HASH_TABLE_SIZE = 40
> >> PR_TUNABLE_NEW_POOL_SIZE = 512
> >> PR_TUNABLE_RCVBUFSZ = 87380
> >> PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_BUFFER_SIZE = 80
> >> PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_SCRUB_TIMER = 30
> >> PR_TUNABLE_SELECT_TIMEOUT = 30
> >> PR_TUNABLE_SNDBUFSZ = 16384
> >> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDENT = 10
> >> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDLE = 600
> >> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLINGER = 180
> >> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLOGIN = 300
> >> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTNOXFER = 300
> >> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTSTALLED = 3600
> >> PR_TUNABLE_XFER_BUFFER_SIZE = 16384
> >> PR_TUNABLE_XFER_SCOREBOARD_UPDATES = 10
> >>
> >>
> >> and running proftd -V on 2_3_2-IB-2
> >>
> >> Features:
> >> + Autoshadow support
> >> - Controls support
> >> + curses support
> >> - Developer support
> >> - DSO support
> >> - IPv6 support
> >> + Largefile support
> >> + ncurses support
> >> - POSIX ACL support
> >> + Shadow file support
> >> + Sendfile support
> >>
> >> Tunable Options:
> >> PR_TUNABLE_BUFFER_SIZE = 1024
> >> PR_TUNABLE_GLOBBING_MAX = 8
> >> PR_TUNABLE_HASH_TABLE_SIZE = 40
> >> PR_TUNABLE_NEW_POOL_SIZE = 512
> >> PR_TUNABLE_RCVBUFSZ = 8192
> >> PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_BUFFER_SIZE = 80
> >> PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_SCRUB_TIMER = 30
> >> PR_TUNABLE_SELECT_TIMEOUT = 30
> >> PR_TUNABLE_SNDBUFSZ = 8192
> >> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDENT = 10
> >> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDLE = 600
> >> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLINGER = 180
> >> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLOGIN = 300
> >> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTNOXFER = 300
> >> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTSTALLED = 3600
> >> PR_TUNABLE_XFER_BUFFER_SIZE = 1024
> >> PR_TUNABLE_XFER_SCOREBOARD_UPDATES = 10
> >>
> >>
> >> Further more the tinky proftpd has support (modules) for dyndns,
> >> shaper and ctrls (see proftpd -vv) which the 2_3_2-IB-2 has not.
> >>
> >> I'll change the RCVBUFSZ to the size of SNDBUFSZ and we
> >> should discuss which modules are really needed for the ftp.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> regards
> >> flip
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Aurel schrieb:
> >>
> >>> Can you send us your proftpd.conf file !
> >>> Indeed with mine, transfers are limited to 1.5M/s !
> >>>
> >>> Selon Julius Loman <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 01:37:46PM +0200, Julius Loman
> >>>> <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:13:05PM +0200, Aurel <massman@xxxxxxx>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Can you give us the FTP speed levels as well for information?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> ftp is ok (but was not working out-of-box, beacuse of unknown
> >>>>> directive
> >>>>> in configuration file)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> measured on 100MB file with wget: 6.92M/s
> >>>>>
> >>>> further testing gives me slightly better speeds when i mount the share
> >>>> on my linux laptop with cifs instead of smbfs (about 2.9 MB/s)
> >>>> when accessing from windows, it is the same as with smbfs (1.7MB/s)
> >>>>
> >>>> could you guys post your smb.conf you have on your nas ? i haven't
> >>>> touched mine yet, but i want a comparision - just to be sure
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Selon Julius Loman <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi everybody
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm using tinky-2_3_2-mu-02.2 and I've got quite poor throughtput
> >>>>>>> via
> >>>>>>> SMB, only about 1.4MB/sec upload to NAS and about 1.9MB/sec
> >>>>>>> download.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> When doing download/upload operations - top shows me that smbd is
> >>>>>>>
> >>>> eating
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> ~95% cpu and i receive many software interrups (si value in top is
> >>>>>>> ~34%).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Do you have such poor throughtput as well or do I have some shitty
> >>>>>>> piece of hardware ? (Maybe slower CPU than you ?) I expected a lot
> >>>>>>>
> >>>> more.
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> FYI - dma is turned on and I didn't measure performance with
> >>>>>>> original
> >>>>>>> firmware, because I've overwritten it with tinky in the same hour as
> >>>>>>>
> >>>> the
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> box arrived.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Here is my cpuinfo:
> >>>>>>> Processor : FA52Xid(wb) rev 1 (v4l)
> >>>>>>> BogoMIPS : 69.83
> >>>>>>> Features : swp half thumb
> >>>>>>> CPU implementer : 0x66
> >>>>>>> CPU architecture: 4
> >>>>>>> CPU variant : 0x0
> >>>>>>> CPU part : 0x526
> >>>>>>> CPU revision : 1
> >>>>>>> Cache type : write-back
> >>>>>>> Cache clean : cp15 c7 ops
> >>>>>>> Cache lockdown : format B
> >>>>>>> Cache format : Harvard
> >>>>>>> I size : 8192
> >>>>>>> I assoc : 2
> >>>>>>> I line length : 16
> >>>>>>> I sets : 256
> >>>>>>> D size : 4096
> >>>>>>> D assoc : 2
> >>>>>>> D line length : 16
> >>>>>>> D sets : 128
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hardware : Sword sl2312
> >>>>>>> Revision : 0000
> >>>>>>> Serial : 0000000000000000
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [ Julius Loman ][ lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx ][ http://lomo.kyberia.net ][
> >>>>>>>
> >>>> icq:35732873
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> ]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Aurel le bel homme
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [ Julius Loman ][ lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx ][ http://lomo.kyberia.net ][
> >>>>>
> >>>> icq:35732873 ]
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>> [ Julius Loman ][ lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx ][ http://lomo.kyberia.net ][
> >>>> icq:35732873
> >>>> ]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> --
> >>> Aurel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
--
Aurel
Other related posts:
