[nas-2000] Re: Poor performance ?
- From: "flipstar@xxxxxxx" <flipstar@xxxxxxx>
- To: nas-2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 17:06:07 +0200
here it is ..
Aurel schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Does someone has the original proftpd binary file ?
> I would like to try on my tinky box to see my performances.
>
>
> Selon philipp Wehrheim <flipstar@xxxxxxx>:
>
>> sure
>>
>> by the way today i visited the kiss webpage the kiss 1600 looks cool
>> but my question is what exectly can you do with the kissdx
>> and dos the kiss support upnp(av)?
>>
>>
>> thanks
>> flip
>>
>> Julius Loman schrieb:
>>> On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 09:32:32PM +0200, philipp Wehrheim
>> <flipstar@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> there are now 2 new ipk's lsof and strace ...
>>> could you add the kissdx and relevant packages to your web please ? just
>>> if somebody is interested.
>>>
>>> i've sent you an email two days ago with the link -
>>> http://lomo.kyberia.net/nas2000/.
>>>
>>> regards
>>> julius
>>>> philipp Wehrheim schrieb:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> today I did some stacing and compared tinky's and raidsonic's proftp
>>>>> work.
>>>>>
>>>>> when running proftp (the same binary) on tinky it looks like this.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ................
>>>>> time(NULL) = 67811881
>>>>> alarm(219) = 0
>>>>> write(11, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
>>>>> 8192) = 8192
>>>>> gettimeofday({67811881, 150000}, NULL) = 0
>>>>> select(14, [13], [], NULL, {1, 0}) = 1 (in [13], left {1, 0})
>>>>> read(13, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
>>>>> 8192) = 8192
>>>>> alarm(0) = 219
>>>>> time(NULL) = 67811881
>>>>> time(NULL) = 67811881
>>>>> alarm(219) = 0
>>>>> alarm(0) = 219
>>>>> time(NULL) = 67811881
>>>>> time(NULL) = 67811881
>>>>> alarm(219) = 0
>>>>> write(11, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
>>>>> 8192) = 8192
>>>>> gettimeofday({67811881, 510000}, NULL) = 0
>>>>> select(14, [13], [], NULL, {1, 0}) = 1 (in [13], left {1, 0})
>>>>> read(13, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
>>>>> 8192) = 8192
>>>>> alarm(0) = 219
>>>>> time(NULL) = 67811881
>>>>> time(NULL) = 67811881
>>>>> alarm(219) = 0
>>>>> alarm(0) = 219
>>>>> time(NULL) = 67811881
>>>>> time(NULL) = 67811881
>>>>> .............
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> and on the raidsonic fw like this
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ...............
>>>>> time(NULL) = 101373
>>>>>
>>>>> alarm(72) = 0
>>>>>
>>>>> alarm(0) = 72
>>>>>
>>>>> time(NULL) = 101373
>>>>>
>>>>> time(NULL) = 101373
>>>>>
>>>>> alarm(72) = 0
>>>>>
>>>>> sendfile64(9, 11, [193131480], 4294967295) = 65536
>>>>>
>>>>> alarm(0) = 72
>>>>>
>>>>> time(NULL) = 101373
>>>>>
>>>>> time(NULL) = 101373
>>>>>
>>>>> alarm(72) = 0
>>>>>
>>>>> alarm(0) = 72
>>>>>
>>>>> time(NULL) = 101373
>>>>>
>>>>> time(NULL) = 101374
>>>>>
>>>>> alarm(72) = 0
>>>>>
>>>>> sendfile64(9, 11, [193164248], 4294967295) = 65536
>>>>>
>>>>> alarm(0) = 72
>>>>>
>>>>> time(NULL) = 101374
>>>>>
>>>>> time(NULL) = 101374
>>>>>
>>>>> alarm(72) = 0
>>>>>
>>>>> alarm(0) = 72
>>>>> .................
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> to me it looks like the reads and write proftpd is doing when executed
>>>>> on tinky eats up lots of time ....
>>>>>
>>>>> Im not sure here it comes from ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Anybody having an idea?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Aurelien schrieb:
>>>>>> Good Mornin' everybody !
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here are mine. they are very poor and i'm still investigating to find
>>>>>> some answers....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Firmware: tinky-2_3_2-mu-02.2.tgz
>>>>>>
>> <http://www.nas-2000.org/download/tinky-2_3_2_mu_02/tinky-2_3_2-mu-02.2.tgz>
>>>>>> FTP:
>>>>>> Up: 1.5MB/S
>>>>>> Down: 1.8MB/S (==> 2.3MB/S with initial proftpd.conf file)
>>>>>> SMB:
>>>>>> Up: 1.5MB/S
>>>>>> Down: 1.8MB/S
>>>>>> File System:
>>>>>> Ext3 (400GB)
>>>>>> Drive test results:
>>>>>> root@NASDRIVE:~ # hdparm -tT /dev/hda1
>>>>>> /dev/hda1:
>>>>>> Timing buffer-cache reads: 124 MB in 2.04 seconds = 60.78 MB/sec
>>>>>> Timing buffered disk reads: 26 MB in 3.00 seconds = 8.67 MB/sec
>>>>>> Computer OS:
>>>>>> XP, same results with ubuntu live cd
>>>>>> Network:
>>>>>> NASBOX / LINKSYS WRT54G / ETHERNET
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> philipp Wehrheim a écrit :
>>>>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> here is my proftpd bechmark:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I used a 200M file created with
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dd if=/dev/zero of=./200M_file bs=1M count=200
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When I did these test samba, nfs and well yes proftd where running.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> for tinky-2.3.2-mu-02.2 I get this results:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> upload
>>>>>>> time ncftpput -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.100 . ./200M_file
>>>>>>> ./200M_file: 200.00 MB 2.83 MB/s
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> real 1m11.035s
>>>>>>> user 0m0.056s
>>>>>>> sys 0m1.140s
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> download
>>>>>>> time ncftpget -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.100 . ./200M_file
>>>>>>> 200M_file: 200.00 MB 5.83 MB/s
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> real 0m34.539s
>>>>>>> user 0m0.400s
>>>>>>> sys 0m4.956s
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> for raidsonic fw 2_3_2-IB-2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> upload
>>>>>>> time ncftpput -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.99 . ./200M_file
>>>>>>> ./200M_file: 200.00 MB 5.65 MB/s
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> real 0m35.999s
>>>>>>> user 0m0.072s
>>>>>>> sys 0m0.984s
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> download
>>>>>>> time ncftpget -u admin -p admin 192.168.10.99 . ./200M_file
>>>>>>> 200M_file: 200.00 MB 4.23 MB/s
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> real 0m47.516s
>>>>>>> user 0m0.456s
>>>>>>> sys 0m4.844s
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I think Tinky is doing quite well when it comes to download
>>>>>>> but is very slow with uploads.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Running proftd -V on the tinky fw
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Features:
>>>>>>> + Autoshadow support
>>>>>>> + Controls support
>>>>>>> + curses support
>>>>>>> - Developer support
>>>>>>> - DSO support
>>>>>>> - IPv6 support
>>>>>>> + Largefile support
>>>>>>> + ncurses support
>>>>>>> - POSIX ACL support
>>>>>>> + Shadow file support
>>>>>>> + Sendfile support
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tunable Options:
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_BUFFER_SIZE = 1024
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_GLOBBING_MAX = 8
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_HASH_TABLE_SIZE = 40
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_NEW_POOL_SIZE = 512
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_RCVBUFSZ = 87380
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_BUFFER_SIZE = 80
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_SCRUB_TIMER = 30
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_SELECT_TIMEOUT = 30
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_SNDBUFSZ = 16384
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDENT = 10
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDLE = 600
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLINGER = 180
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLOGIN = 300
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTNOXFER = 300
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTSTALLED = 3600
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_XFER_BUFFER_SIZE = 16384
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_XFER_SCOREBOARD_UPDATES = 10
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and running proftd -V on 2_3_2-IB-2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Features:
>>>>>>> + Autoshadow support
>>>>>>> - Controls support
>>>>>>> + curses support
>>>>>>> - Developer support
>>>>>>> - DSO support
>>>>>>> - IPv6 support
>>>>>>> + Largefile support
>>>>>>> + ncurses support
>>>>>>> - POSIX ACL support
>>>>>>> + Shadow file support
>>>>>>> + Sendfile support
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tunable Options:
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_BUFFER_SIZE = 1024
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_GLOBBING_MAX = 8
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_HASH_TABLE_SIZE = 40
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_NEW_POOL_SIZE = 512
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_RCVBUFSZ = 8192
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_BUFFER_SIZE = 80
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_SCOREBOARD_SCRUB_TIMER = 30
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_SELECT_TIMEOUT = 30
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_SNDBUFSZ = 8192
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDENT = 10
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTIDLE = 600
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLINGER = 180
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTLOGIN = 300
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTNOXFER = 300
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_TIMEOUTSTALLED = 3600
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_XFER_BUFFER_SIZE = 1024
>>>>>>> PR_TUNABLE_XFER_SCOREBOARD_UPDATES = 10
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Further more the tinky proftpd has support (modules) for dyndns,
>>>>>>> shaper and ctrls (see proftpd -vv) which the 2_3_2-IB-2 has not.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll change the RCVBUFSZ to the size of SNDBUFSZ and we
>>>>>>> should discuss which modules are really needed for the ftp.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> regards
>>>>>>> flip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aurel schrieb:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you send us your proftpd.conf file !
>>>>>>>> Indeed with mine, transfers are limited to 1.5M/s !
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Selon Julius Loman <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 01:37:46PM +0200, Julius Loman
>>>>>>>>> <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:13:05PM +0200, Aurel <massman@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Can you give us the FTP speed levels as well for information?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ftp is ok (but was not working out-of-box, beacuse of unknown
>>>>>>>>>> directive
>>>>>>>>>> in configuration file)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> measured on 100MB file with wget: 6.92M/s
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> further testing gives me slightly better speeds when i mount the
>> share
>>>>>>>>> on my linux laptop with cifs instead of smbfs (about 2.9 MB/s)
>>>>>>>>> when accessing from windows, it is the same as with smbfs (1.7MB/s)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> could you guys post your smb.conf you have on your nas ? i haven't
>>>>>>>>> touched mine yet, but i want a comparision - just to be sure
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Selon Julius Loman <lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everybody
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm using tinky-2_3_2-mu-02.2 and I've got quite poor throughtput
>>>>>>>>>>>> via
>>>>>>>>>>>> SMB, only about 1.4MB/sec upload to NAS and about 1.9MB/sec
>>>>>>>>>>>> download.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> When doing download/upload operations - top shows me that smbd is
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> eating
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ~95% cpu and i receive many software interrups (si value in top is
>>>>>>>>>>>> ~34%).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have such poor throughtput as well or do I have some shitty
>>>>>>>>>>>> piece of hardware ? (Maybe slower CPU than you ?) I expected a lot
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> more.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI - dma is turned on and I didn't measure performance with
>>>>>>>>>>>> original
>>>>>>>>>>>> firmware, because I've overwritten it with tinky in the same hour
>> as
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> box arrived.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is my cpuinfo:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Processor : FA52Xid(wb) rev 1 (v4l)
>>>>>>>>>>>> BogoMIPS : 69.83
>>>>>>>>>>>> Features : swp half thumb
>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU implementer : 0x66
>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU architecture: 4
>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU variant : 0x0
>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU part : 0x526
>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU revision : 1
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cache type : write-back
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cache clean : cp15 c7 ops
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cache lockdown : format B
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cache format : Harvard
>>>>>>>>>>>> I size : 8192
>>>>>>>>>>>> I assoc : 2
>>>>>>>>>>>> I line length : 16
>>>>>>>>>>>> I sets : 256
>>>>>>>>>>>> D size : 4096
>>>>>>>>>>>> D assoc : 2
>>>>>>>>>>>> D line length : 16
>>>>>>>>>>>> D sets : 128
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hardware : Sword sl2312
>>>>>>>>>>>> Revision : 0000
>>>>>>>>>>>> Serial : 0000000000000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ Julius Loman ][ lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx ][ http://lomo.kyberia.net ][
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> icq:35732873
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Aurel le bel homme
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [ Julius Loman ][ lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx ][ http://lomo.kyberia.net ][
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> icq:35732873 ]
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [ Julius Loman ][ lomo@xxxxxxxxxxx ][ http://lomo.kyberia.net ][
>>>>>>>>> icq:35732873
>>>>>>>>> ]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Aurel
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Aurel
>
Other related posts:
