[nanomsg] Re: publisher side filtering
- From: Paul Colomiets <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 23:42:57 +0300
Hi Garrett,
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Garrett D'Amore <garrett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I see two ways to solve this.
>
> The first is to introduce a new pattern, which has similar semantics to
> PUB/SUB, but uses publisher filtering. It requires some of the same req/rep
> reliable transport for the subscription messages (but not for the actual
> content itself.) In many ways, this would be easiest.
>
> The other approach that can be followed allows for a compatible upgrade to
> nanomsg and the protocols that would allow implementations (and users!) to
> enable publisher side filtering. Here’s my proposal, which I think is about
> as simple as can be.
>
What's wrong with zeromq/crossroads-io approach?
--
Paul
Other related posts:
