[nanomsg] Re: kdbus patches posted for review
- From: Paul Colomiets <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 12:29:00 +0200
Hi Dirkjan,
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There was an article in LWN today covering the initial proposal for
> kdbus patches on LKML:
>
> http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/619068/108002dc173ad463/
>
I look forward for it for some time. Probably we may add a "kdbus://"
protocol and nn_allocmsg(..., NN_KDBUS_MEMFD) flag. But I'm not sure
what it gives for nanomsg? Performance?
Given the nanomsg architecture it's unclear who will create a kdbus fd
to keep bus functioning.
Also it's we should evaluate a bloom filtering which is a part of
kdbus, on how it can be used for nanomsg pubsub (may be we need to
have pluggable filtering to take advantage of kdbus' bloom filters).
--
Paul
Other related posts:
