[nanomsg] Re: initial code repo for Go version of SP protocols
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 06:34:07 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 24/03/14 06:08, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> On 24/03/14 04:57, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> It would be pretty straight forward to add UDP support. The
>> issue will be defining what the wire format for UDP looks like. I
>> have some thoughts here and if I had my druthers each SP message
>> would translate to a single UDP datagram. Others might have
>> different ideas.
>
> Yes. I would say that UDP-mapping RFC should contain a single
> sentence: "SP message maps directly to an UDP datagram."
Well, adding the 8-byte header (same as with TCP) would probably save
users a lot of trouble.
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTL8PPAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YdmcH+wV0bT1SHdmbkZsUS/HUsdpc
sAB1qq2cAblPfwAMyh3UdDUOS9WKdpPgv7Zy0ljN0BcPa7heKEL5xBJhtC/nIlXQ
Pl1YdTi+gvNFiSnT1wiC1DBpfegKNByobYal6UjGct7mKj8beo30IyjPBGD4n/c3
efqD5TNW94PJK2Ck/x69ETjYqGBNzCfwn7yifidMyOeSvnAGz74IpW1H675UV4HZ
C6eptdvF0kJCORuwqPRxnCOk2gx/7E3pCoLJtmC/5LHfQV0fMuDesrByV7unn+Wj
mtDvWhA9t6m/2FarFpj2Xz/Y+Vo5nWLDkc6R9emGSzhGKMkxfOFu1AxaU45uaCQ=
=GdyG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
