[nanomsg] Re: accessing control IDs

  • From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 07:51:06 +0200

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/05/14 06:00, Drew Crawford wrote:
> How about some kind of API-compatible req/rep clone, say
> "sreq/srep" (s for state) that implements session functionality?

You can do that as protocols are pluggable.

However, my feeling is that you rather want to implement a new
transport, something in lines of "TCP with authentication" protocol.
Transports are pluggable as well, so it's technically possible,
however, the old maxim "don't do your own crypto" still applies.

Martin

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTacnKAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YYOAH/2grQPGtbUR458DJ1Ex6BQCD
mzmdnHUv5KnN5rYbo+q/KL6tQnF4tN2q6MgZwv87zqU8nSdqNnN+ep3Py5zh3tCb
ckeQ5nnoOjkyGyjjYLOKfV3ACpOKSNo0EbfkqUDu5upJwxTzqtV9FUITotP2+gC6
Tvx/cLf8wvcYn7UMfR/n1ZUkmeUnGuV0echjnO28boANG1KeKT3HevWAaNr545Ep
05C/P5rgZXY8/d/QSbtZfuUa3mYgH5VAOv43HteeGANRjM/srR75+qaqTYi3byv6
9ZPdz/LcRyiQfaBcMtCMdPZFQ6VEtn+USdgGHM3xYEU73dh5wXIoUntEGCtlElA=
=ZYtL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Other related posts: