2013-09-26 11:08 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta:
Hi, I have added some patches to get rid of compilation warnings that turn up on my Fedora 19 machine. I have also made an RPM spec file, which I intend to submit to Fedora and become a packager of nanomsg in Fedora, too. Both patches are submitted hereby under the MIT license. However, I just read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License and it says the name "MIT license" is ambiguous. Is it okay in the RPM specfile that I used the MIT/X11 license name?
The generated nanomsg.spec file should be in the source tarball, so an incremental change is also needed.
Best regards, Zoltán Böszörményi
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am index 762f6d9..dee1c31 100644 --- a/Makefile.am +++ b/Makefile.am @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ endif # Extra files to be included into the source package. -EXTRA_DIST += doc/asciidoc.conf doc/htmldoc.css $(MAN1) $(MAN3) $(MAN7) +EXTRA_DIST += nanomsg.spec doc/asciidoc.conf doc/htmldoc.css $(MAN1) $(MAN3) $(MAN7) ################################################################################ # performance tests #