[nanomsg] Re: The name service for nanomsg
- From: Paul Colomiets <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:05:10 +0300
Hi Martin,
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> TXT could work as well, and while it's frowned upon for new protocols the
>> lack
>> of anything that matches exactly could get you past that in the
>> experimental
>> stage - until either something is found that works better and doesn't
>> perpetuate the abuse of TXT records, or is created (see TSIG etc).
>
>
> My feeling is that if we go with DNS, SRV records won't be sufficient. This,
> we are left with TXT.
>
So basically we will not use DNS we will *abuse* DNS. At least that's
my feeling :)
--
Paul
Other related posts:
