[nanomsg] Re: Status of Windows IPC ?
- From: Timothee Besset <ttimo@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 17:08:25 -0500
https://github.com/TTimo/nanomsg/commit/8830bb35df171284a185f850d73a153a55d017f7
Alright this is the direction I'm heading, for now I've just created the
pipe and started listening for client connections. This seemed like the
right things to do in nn_bipc_start_listening.
The code still makes calls to things like nn_usock_start after that, which
issues socket() calls and fails .. but I haven't touched the client side
yet.
Anyway, any feedback welcome. Only spent a few hours in the nanomsg
internals at this point.
TTimo
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Timothee Besset <ttimo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'd like to better understand what's involved before committing to
> anything there.
> Exploring the implementation atm, I'll send more precise questions once
> I've done a tour of the code.
>
> TTimo
>
> I'm on the irc channel btw (US timezones mostly).
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 05/04/14 04:57, Timothee Besset wrote:
>>
>> > - Shouldn't the documentation reflect what is actually implemented?
>> > It is very misleading as things stand now. Especially if this has
>> > been the situation for months.
>>
>> Yes. I'll fix the docs.
>>
>> > - How much work does this represent, closing the loop on this and
>> > actually getting the functionality? Using a TCP loopback is a
>> > no-go, a lot of firewalls, antivirus/malware things will get in the
>> > way of that (we've tried).
>>
>> The hard part (IOCP support) I've already done. What's missing is the
>> actual implementation of NamedPipes transport. Would you like to give
>> it a go? In general, I think, getting Windows-specific features done
>> tends to be a problem because there's a lot less of
>> contribute-the-code-back mentallity in the Windows community.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>>
>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTP4DIAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YppkH/2HcmEoGs1cKYuntv1YvAoeA
>> j77v07d6iYCy8VlXWD1yxbL8S/+hYz5prWKEAv2q2iUUrig7exBDAZT21x7tTQEI
>> 8cBEXfvWbZNPrSGPG+4RUoGmQtWHLxBoLxF/5D26GsCrcq7HO/t4xxxQ2Tv/53n7
>> S1Fwx8krHitizjQdXbXTXMXTOpKnsxNxW6pC7ugeuAutElH/Sea2JMMDo/SdB2ra
>> oYB9Du533/EhuB/dpZvyrQmXKaNpDMUK1Ca4GXJzjr36mkT7qNEKC4YEARQQ0QE4
>> kiOQwRbDX0eIb8XdtREA5pGh6nwYiLOxjAXbaMoUWTEHz590Xlnp3pyaVmhpo6Q=
>> =8Svc
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
