[nanomsg] Re: Release packaging and build systems

  • From: Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nanomsg <nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 08:48:41 +0200

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thougts anyone? Arguments for keeping the 0MQ compatibility library in
> place?

I think removing the compatibility library would be fine, for the
reasons you state.

Cheers,

Dirkjan

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. nanomsg
  3. Archive
  4. 07-2013