I've presented nothing but facts about it.
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Garrett D'Amore <garrett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You’ve yet to present any “facts” to me in this case that I am prepared to
take at face value. All you’ve done is insist that I debug the problem *in
your code/framework* because you’ve been incredibly unwilling to consider
that the problem *might* be in your code, and you’ve been unwilling to
present me a demonstration case that doesn’t carry all the baggage of your
C# framework and the C# test framework. So I’m left with “facts” that are
actually really just “opinions”.
I will be utterly astonished if there is some bad interaction between the
protocol layers; I’ve taken extreme caution to ensure that they do not share
any protocol-specific or transport-specific state.
Lots of times I make mistakes and create bugs. However, I’m really
skeptical that this is one of them.
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:32 PM Michael Powell <mwpowellhtx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, really. I didn't present anything that I didn't have facts
presented to back me up.
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Garrett D'Amore <garrett@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Michael…
I was sorry to read your message on the nanomsg list. You’ve leveled
accusations at both me and at nng. The accusation you made about my
character is one that I would recommend you apply to yourself. There
is an
old proverb that I am reminded of…
“Better to be silent and thought a fool, then to open your mouth and
remove
all doubt.”
My next steps will be demonstrate (by writing the test program to prove
it)
that your accusations regarding nng are false. On other matters I, at
least, will remain silent.
- Garrett
